Search Results for "Oppression"

272 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 272 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Cross FIRs in Assault Case Following Amicable Settlement Between Parties. Court Holds That Where Dispute Is Personal and Parties Have Genuinely Settled, FIRs for Offences Under Sections 307, 324, 143, 144, 147, 149 IPC Can Be Quashed to Secure Ends of Justice.

The judgment concerns two cross criminal writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Contempt Action Against Judges for Alleged Judicial Misconduct. Court holds that judges cannot be prosecuted for acts done in judicial capacity and that contempt of court proceedings cannot be initiated against judges for their judicial orders.

The petitioners, Common Citizen of India (Common Man) through Rakesh Omprakash Agarwal and Peoples Rights Vigilance Organisation, filed a writ petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Extortion Case Due to Settlement Between Parties. Offences Under Sections 386, 387, 447, 506, 109 IPC Are Compoundable or Non-Serious, and Continuation Would Be Futile.

The applicants (accused) filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of RCC No.3212 of 2015 arisi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Accused in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute and Lack of Criminal Intent. Failure to Perform Contractual Obligation Does Not Attract Offences Under Sections 406, 420, 120B IPC Without Evidence of Dishonest Intention at Inception.

The judgment arises from a criminal application and writ petition filed by Mahendra Premji Gangar and Kalyanji Premji Gangar (applicants/petitioners),...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Modifies Conviction from Section 376(2)(f) to Section 376(1) IPC in Rape of Minor Case — Sentence Reduced to Period Already Served. Victim's Age Above 12 Years Makes Section 376(2)(f) Inapplicable, Minimum Sentence Provision Not Attracted.

The appellant, Shahanawaj Shamsuddin Bhadgaonkar, was convicted by the Adhoc District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan, in Sessions Case ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Complaint Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case for Lack of Specific Allegations. Vicarious Liability Under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act Requires Specific Averments of Role in Company Affairs.

The case involves a criminal complaint filed by respondent No. 1 (complainant) under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Applications to Recall Consent Terms and Set Aside Consent Decrees in Property Disputes Between Family Members. Court Holds That Consent Terms Recorded by Counsel Are Binding on Parties and Cannot Be Challenged on Grounds of Fraud Without Proper Pleadings and Evidence.

The judgment pertains to two Notice of Motions filed by the defendants in two separate suits seeking recall and setting aside of consent terms and con...