Search Results for "Milind case"

1107 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1107 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.4761 OF 2024

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as dying declarations were contradictory and not corroborated by medical evidence or independent witnesses.

The appellant, Raju Kondiram More, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of his wife, Jana Raju More, by setti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder of Wife by Assault and Acid Attack — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Circumstantial evidence including medical evidence, motive, and recovery of incriminating articles held sufficient to prove guilt under Section 302 IPC and Section 498-A IPC.

The appellant, Sitaram Dada Sarode, was convicted by the Trial Court for the murder of his wife Sangita by assaulting her with a lid of autoclave and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for setting wife ablaze set aside as dying declaration was not recorded in exact words of deceased and lacked doctor's certification.

The appellant, Dashrath Arun Sasane, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for the murder of his wife, Sharmila, by set...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder in Bullock Cart Race Dispute. Eye Witness Testimony Found Credible Despite Minor Discrepancies, Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Motive Under Section 302 IPC.

The present appeal challenges the legality of the judgment dated 14.09.2013 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Court, Islampur in Sessions Case...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Inordinate Delay in Considering Representation. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Representation Remained Unattended for Over Three Months, Violating Constitutional Safeguard Under Article 22(5).

The petitioner, Premchand @ Babu Punjabi @ Tatu Manohar Dhakani, was detained under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Material from Development Site. Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 for excavation during construction pursuant to valid development permission.

The petitioner, Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Ltd., a company engaged in real estate development, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tahsildar's Demand for Royalty on Excavated Material During Construction. Held that Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty on material excavated pursuant to valid development permission under MRTP Act and NA permission under MLR Code.

The petitioner, originally Flagship Infrastructure Pvt Ltd and now Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Limited, filed a writ petition challenging a show ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Fishermen Cooperative's Petition Against Demolition of Fishermen Huts in Coastal Zone. Court Holds That Traditional Fishing Communities Have Customary Rights to Occupy Foreshore Land for Livelihood, Subject to Environmental Clearances Under CRZ Notification, 2011.

The petitioner, Mariyayi Macchimaar Sahkari Sanstha Maryadit, a cooperative society of traditional fishermen, filed a writ petition challenging the pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Case on Bifurcation of Interest and Service Charges. Tribunal's finding that no service tax liability arises prior to 01.03.2006 due to absence of mechanism for bifurcation of value of service from interest amount upheld.

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging the order of the Cust...