Search Results for "Mahazar"

795 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 795 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeals Against Acquittal of Three Accused in Murder Case Under IPC. Charges Involve Conspiracy, Murder, and Destruction of Evidence; Appellant Challenges Trial Court's Acquittal.

The matter involved two criminal appeals preferred against the judgment of acquittal rendered by the Fast Track Court-I, Bengaluru in S.C. No.489/2004...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case — Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Prosecution's case based on motive and last seen evidence held insufficient to convict accused under Sections 302, 379, 201 read with 34 IPC.

The State of Karnataka appealed against the judgment of acquittal passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Chikmagalur in S.C.No.59/2011, acquitting th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 302 IPC in Dowry Murder Case; Questions Sustainability of Conviction When Co-Accused Were Acquitted. Appeal Seeks Re-appreciation of Circumstantial Evidence and Medical Opinion on Strangulation; No Final Verdict in Provided Text.

In this criminal appeal before the High Court of Karnataka, the appellant, accused No.1, challenged his conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Pen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Convicted Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt, Conviction under Sections 302 and 498A IPC Set Aside.

The appellant, Venkateshanaika, was convicted by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Davanagere in S.C. No. 164/2015 for offences punishabl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction for Murder Based on Dying Declaration. The appeal challenged the reliability of the dying declaration and the sufficiency of evidence under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a criminal appeal filed by accused Nos. 1 and 2 against their conviction and sentence of life imprisonment for the m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction in Rape and Murder of Minor; Confirms Death Sentence. Eight-year-old victim was raped and murdered; accused convicted under IPC and POCSO Act, death penalty confirmed under Section 302 IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act.

The case arose out of the rape and murder of an 8-year-old girl in Yakapura village. The victim was the daughter of PW.1, who was a coolie worker. On ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Assault and Wrongful Confinement Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 324 and 342 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Puttasiddamma @ Puttasiddi and Samandaiah, were convicted by the I-Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Mandya in S.C.No.50/2013 for off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Tribunal's Award for Injuries Sustained in Hit-and-Run Accident. Delay in Filing FIR Does Not Discredit Claim When Medical Evidence and Other Circumstances Corroborate the Accident.

The appeal was filed by the insurer, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., challenging the judgment and award dated 05.07.2012 passed by the Addl. Senior C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Forest Assault Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 353 and 307 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove appellant's presence at the scene beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Thomas, was accused No.2 in a case arising from an incident on 18.07.2006 where a group of persons allegedly assaulted forest officials...