Search Results for "Maharashtra Excise"

882 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 882 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Whether Lift Installation Contracts Are 'Works Contract' or 'Sale of Goods' for Sales Tax Purposes. The Matter Was Referred to a Larger Bench to Resolve Conflict Between Prior Rulings and to Determine the Applicability of the Predominant Intention Test After Recent Judgments.

The matter stems from multiple writ petitions and civil appeals challenging the classification of contracts for manufacture, supply and installation o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Holding Retrenchment as Unfair Labour Practice. Non-compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act renders retrenchment illegal and amounts to unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Shekoba Auto Private Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, was engaged in the manufacture of automobile ignition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging Election of Directors to Cooperative Bank Board. Minister's Order Under Section 154 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 Upheld as Valid and Election Process Not Vitiated by Irregularities.

The case involves a batch of Letters Patent Appeals filed by individuals challenging the election of directors to the Yavatmal District Central Cooper...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes NDPS Proceedings Against Directors for Lack of Conscious Possession. Directors of a transport company cannot be held vicariously liable for illegal transportation of poppy straw by driver without proof of knowledge or connivance under NDPS Act.

The petitioners, Sunil Kumar Koushik and Vijay Kochhar, were accused Nos. 2 and 3 in Crime No. 12/2021-22 registered at Indi Excise Police Station for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Seniority Dispute Arising from Cadre Bifurcation and Re-amalgamation in Customs and Excise Department. Dispute Centers on Impact of Separate Data Processing Cadre on Ministerial Employee Seniority Under the 1979 Recruitment Rules.

The case involved a seniority dispute among employees of the Customs and Central Excise Department. The original ministerial cadre, governed by the Ce...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Decree Holder's Application to Implead Auction Purchaser in Execution Proceedings — Order VI Rule 17 CPC Application Rejected as Execution is Not a 'Trial' and Amendment Would Change Nature of Suit

The petitioner, Sangli Zilla Parishad Employees Co-operative Credit Society Limited, had advanced a loan to respondent no.1, Ninaidevi Sahakari Sakhar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Consideration of Settlement Application. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority failed to consider detenu's pending settlement application under Customs Act and Central Excise Act before passing order.

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Charles Patrick, challenged the detention order dated 5.5.2006 passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Whether Refund Claim Under Customs Act Requires Appeal Against Assessment Order. Self-Assessment Under Section 17 and Amendment to Section 27 by Finance Act 2011 Examined.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals filed by assessees and the Union of India against judgments of various High Courts and the Customs, Excise ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Kerala Forest Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Statutory Interpretation. Sandalwood Oil Not Classified as Forest Produce Under Section 2(f), and Prosecution Failed to Prove Illicit Removal from Reserve Forest as Required Under Section 27(1)(d).

The appeal arose from a criminal conviction under the Kerala Forest Act, 1961, involving the appellant, a partner in a firm manufacturing and trading ...