Search Results for "Karnataka Civil Services Rules 2006"

760 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 760 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Validates Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes in Landmark Judgment. Upholding Equality Within Equality: Supreme Court Endorses State's Power to Sub-Classify Scheduled Castes for Targeted Reservation.

The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has upheld the constitutionality of sub-classifying Scheduled Castes for the purpose of reservati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Regularisation of Part-Time Veterinary Assistants — No Right to Regularisation for Part-Time Workers Not Appointed Against Sanctioned Posts.

The petitioners, five individuals appointed as part-time Veterinary Assistants in the Animal Husbandry Department of Tamil Nadu, filed writ petitions ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Upholds Compensation Enhancement for Acquired Land. Court holds that belated acquisition proceedings and failure to pay compensation within five years render acquisition lapsed under Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves a batch of writ appeals filed by the State of Karnataka and its authorities against the judgment of a learned Single Judge in land a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses/Allows Bail to Accused in Murder Case Involving Conspiracy and Long Detention Without Trial. Scope of Section 439 CrPC and Article 21 right to speedy trial evaluated in context of parity with co-accused and threat perception.

The criminal petition was filed by accused Nos. 3 and 4 under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking bail in connection with Crim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Sub-Classification Within Scheduled Castes for Reservation in Punjab Act. State can provide preferential treatment to more backward castes without tinkering with Presidential List under Article 341.

The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Section 4(5) of the Punjab Scheduled Caste and Backward Classes (Reservation in Services) ...