Search Results for "Illegal gratification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Illegal gratification"

456 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 456 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Partially Allows Petition in Service Law Dispute Regarding Suspension Period Treatment. Court holds that acquittal does not automatically entitle full backwages during suspension, but directs treatment of suspension period as duty for qualifying service and pension purposes under Regulation 75 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation (Service) Regulations, 1989.

25 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a petition filed by a former employee of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) seeking a direction to treat his susp...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Airports Authority of India in Disciplinary Matter — Upholds Dismissal of Employee Despite Acquittal in Criminal Case. Standard of Proof in Departmental Enquiry is Preponderance of Probabilities, Not Beyond Reasonable Doubt; Acquittal Based on Benefit of Doubt Does Not Bar Disciplinary Action.

3 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by the Airports Authority of India (AAI) against the judgment of the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court, w...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Removal from Service for Demanding Illegal Gratification. Disciplinary proceedings and appellate order upheld as the petitioner failed to participate in inquiry and the punishment was proportionate to the gravity of misconduct under KVIC E (CCA) Regulations, 2003.

20 Jul 2023

The petitioner, Shri S. K. Kajal, was employed as an Assistant Director in the Khadi & Village Industries Commission, Goa for 30 years. On 09.01.2009,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Service Dispute — Suspension Period Not Automatically Converted to Duty Upon Acquittal. Acquittal in criminal case does not entitle automatic regularization of suspension period as duty under Rule 72(5) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Joining Time, Foreign Service, Payments during Suspension, Dismissal and Removal) Rules, 1981.

8 Jun 2023

The petitioner, Eknath Shankar Kamble, was appointed as a Tracer with Zilla Parishad, Sangli on 17 July 1978. On 18 October 2001, he was apprehended b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Allegation of Bribe Demand Fails as Complainant's Testimony Lacks Corroboration and Material Witnesses Not Examined Under Section 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

30 Aug 2022

The appellant, Sayaji Dashrath Kawade, was serving as Sub-Divisional Engineer in the Department of Telecommunications at Aurangabad. The complainant, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Sarpanch in Corruption Case. Registration of FIR and arrest under Prevention of Corruption Act constitutes disgraceful conduct under Section 39(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, justifying removal without awaiting conviction.

28 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Dr. Narendra Purushottam Ingole, was elected as a Member of Gram Panchayat Wadki in June 2015 and subsequently elected as Sarpanch. A ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Constables in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Hostile Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

30 Jun 2018

The case involves two appeals by police constables convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding and accepting a bribe. The com...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

31 Mar 2016

The appellant, Vinod s/o Savalaram Kanadkhedkar, was a junior clerk in the Tahsil office, Nanded. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Nanded in Spe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Tax Recovery Clerk in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

9 Oct 2015

The appellant, Ravindra Mahadeo Kothamkar, a Tax Recovery Clerk with the Thane Municipal Corporation, was convicted by the Special Judge under Section...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

23 Apr 2015

The appellant, Balkrishna Bhau Desai, a Sectional Engineer in the Public Works Department, was convicted by the Special Judge, Baramati for offences u...

18 19 20 21 22

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)