KAHC010822332025_1
8 Jul 2026The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka heard two intra-court writ appeals filed by M/s MP24 Construction Company, the lead member of a cons...
Search Results for "Deputy Block Development Officer"
623 result(s) found
Found 623 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay Determines Fair Compensation in Appeal Against Enhanced Award Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Cross-Objections Seeking Higher Rate Considered Alongside State's Challenge to Reference Court's Award of Rs.1,500 per sq.m.
17 Apr 2026The State of Maharashtra acquired land in Village Padghe, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad, for the New Bombay Project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1...
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Delivers Common Judgment in Batch of Writ Appeals Against Single Judge Order Dismissing Challenge to Land Acquisition under Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966. The Appeals Concern the Validity of Acquisition Proceedings for an Industrial Area Based on Clearance Granted by State High Level Committee Before the Enactment of the Karnataka Industries (Facilitation) Act, 2002.
10 Apr 2026The matter arose from a batch of writ appeals filed before the High Court of Karnataka against the common order dated 19.11.2012 of a learned Single J...
- 17
High Court
High Court Quashes Income Tax Reopening Notices in Search-Based Assessment Cases Due to Mandatory Application of Section 153C. Assessing Officer Cannot Invoke General Reassessment Provisions Under Sections 147/148 When Material Originates from Search Under Section 132/132A, as Special Provisions Under Section 153C Override and Require Exclusive Procedural Compliance.
7 Jan 2026The judgment concerned a group of petitions challenging notices issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, reopening assessments under Sect...
- 1203
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Communication Denying GST Exemption to Bagalkot Nirmithi Kendra, Holds Society Established by Government Order and Controlled by Government Officials Qualifies as 'Government Entity' under Notification No.32/2017. Society Entitled to Tax Exemption Under Entry No.9B as It Is Wholly Controlled by the State and Undertakes Only Government Construction Works.
25 Nov 2025The writ petition was filed by M/s. Bagalkot Nirmithi Kendra, a society registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960, seeking a dec...
- 16
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Sarpanch Challenging Removal Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Appellate Order Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind. Minister Failed to Consider Petitioner's Submissions, Violating Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 39(3) of the Act.
7 Feb 2022The petitioner, Vilas Bhagwat Jagtap, was elected as Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Mudegaon in October 2017. Due to political rivalry, respondent no. ...
- 30
High Court
- 15
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Election Process of Agriculture Produce Market Committee — No Interference in Mid-Election Process Under Article 226. Inclusion of Names in Voters List Cannot Be Challenged After Election Process Has Commenced; Remedy Lies in Election Petition Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.
22 Jan 2016The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Chandrashekhar Shivram Mudkanna and Shamshoddin Ghudulal Jamadar against the State of Maharashtra...
- 157
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Upholds Property Tax Classification for Marriage Halls in BBMP Rules 2009 — Rule 3(v) Not Ultra Vires or Discriminatory. The court held that classification of marriage/community halls as a separate category for property tax under the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 is reasonable and not violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.
24 Oct 2013This batch of writ petitions challenged the validity of Rule 3(v) of the Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) Property Tax Rules, 2009, which cla...
- 63
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.
1 Jan 1970The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...
- 30
