Search Results for "CPC amendment 1976"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "CPC amendment 1976"

456 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 456 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Judgment Debtor in Execution Proceedings - Order XXI Rule 29 CPC Stay Application Rejected as Suit Not Pending in Same Court. Suit for Injunction Filed by Legal Representatives of Deceased Judgment Debtor Cannot Stay Execution of Decree Attained Finality Up to Supreme Court as Requirements of Order XXI Rule 29 Not Met.

1 Mar 2018

The dispute arose from a suit for specific performance and cancellation of a sale deed (RCS No. 319 of 2000) filed by late Balu Bhuji Lale against Ana...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Waqf Act Jurisdiction Dispute Regarding Suit for Permanent Injunction. Civil Court Jurisdiction for Injunction Suits Involving Waqf Property is Not Barred Under Section 85 of Waqf Act, 1995 When Dispute Does Not Involve Questions About Nature of Property.

28 Oct 2021

The dispute originated from a suit filed by the plaintiff (first respondent) against the defendant (appellant) and others for mandatory and permanent ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Civil Procedure Case — Suit Must Proceed De Novo After Plaint Returned for Lack of Jurisdiction. Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Agreement Ousts Jurisdiction of Gurgaon Court, Rendering Proceedings Void Ab Initio Under Order VII Rule 10 CPC.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court considered a reference arising from a suit for recovery filed by the respondent against the appellant based on a franchise agreement...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Case — Ex-parte Decree Set Aside Due to Improper Service of Summons. First Appellate Court's Order Restored as Trial Court Failed to Comply with Order V Rule 17 CPC.

14 Jan 2022

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of contract (O.S.No.126/2007) alleging that the respondent/defendant executed an agreeme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Director's Evidence in Specific Performance Suit — Order 18 Rule 3A CPC Does Not Apply to Company Director. Director of Plaintiff-Company Can Be Examined After Constituted Attorney Without Prior Permission Under Order 18 Rule 3A CPC.

23 Aug 2019

The petitioners, defendants in a suit for specific performance of a contract based on email exchanges, challenged the trial court's order allowing the...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Considers Maintainability of Regular First Appeal Under Section 96 CPC and Examines Plaintiff’s Readiness and Willingness in Suit for Specific Performance of Agricultural Land Sale Agreement; Trial Court Had Dismissed Specific Performance but Directed Refund of Advance with Interest

3 Mar 2015

The appeal arose from the judgment and decree dated 27.09.2014 in O.S. No.1/2011 passed by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Tiptur, partly decreeing t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Notice Sent to Wrong Address and Not to the Correct Corporate Entity.

2 Apr 2019

The petitioners, Prerana Sharma, S. Nagarajan, and B. Ashoka, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrP...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Suit for Recovery of Money, Remands for Trial on Evidence Due to Disputed Facts on Limitation. The Court Held That Limitation Issue Cannot Be Decided as a Preliminary Issue Under Order XIV Rule 2 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, When Facts Are Contested, Requiring Evidence on Nature of Transactions and Repayment Terms.

31 Jan 2022

The appeal arose from a judgment of a Single Judge of the High Court of Delhi in RFA No 5 of 2019, which upheld the trial court's dismissal of a suit ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit as Barred by Limitation and Lack of Jurisdiction in Property Dispute Between Family Members. Suit for partition and accounts filed after 30 years from the date of cause of action is time-barred under Articles 65 and 113 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and the court lacks territorial jurisdiction as the property is situated outside its jurisdiction.

11 Mar 2020

The plaintiffs, Raishi S. Chheda and others, filed a suit for partition and accounts against the defendants, Dhirajlal R. Chheda and others, in the Bo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Chamber Summons Filed by Defendant for Return of Plaint in Suit for Damages Under Lease Agreement. Application Seeks Transfer to Chennai Court Citing Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause; Court Also Considers Limitation and Cause of Action.

20 Aug 2013

The matter pertained to a chamber summons filed by the defendant in a suit for damages. The defendant, Integrated Finance Co. Ltd., sought return of t...

18 19 20 21 22

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)