Search Results for "Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948"

295 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 295 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Slum Rehabilitation Area Declaration Where No Show Cause Notice Was Issued. The Court Examines Whether Principles of Natural Justice Require Opportunity of Hearing Before Section 3C(1) Declaration Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

This writ petition was filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the declaration of certain property as a Slum Rehabilitation Area under Section 3C(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows State and Claimant Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Determined at Rs. 30 per sq.m. with 30% Deduction for Development. Court applies belting method and deducts development cost for large land parcel acquired for Nhava-Sheva water supply.

The case involves two appeals arising from the same award dated 30th September 1989 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Raigad at Alibag in La...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Application for Appointment of Receiver in Partition Suit. Notice of Motion Seeks Interim Relief for Joint Family Properties Allegedly Misappropriated by Co-Owners.

The plaintiff filed a suit for declaration that he is entitled to a 1/10th share in the assets and properties of the joint family and for partition by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Agreement for Sale of Agricultural Land Not Enforceable as Plaintiff Did Not Demonstrate Financial Capacity and Conduct Showed Lack of Readiness.

The appellant, Jayantilal Devji Shah, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale of agricultural land against the respondents. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Impleading Third Parties in Civil Suit Challenging Demolition Notices Under MRTP Act. Court Holds That Third Parties Having Direct Interest in Suit Property and Being Affected by Decision Are Necessary Parties Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.

The dispute arose from a civil suit filed by the petitioners before the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Thane, challenging three notices issue...