Search Results for "Article 300-A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Article 300-A"

353 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 353 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Payment of Provident Fund Dues from Bank Sale Proceeds. Section 11(2) of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 creates a first charge over assets of the establishment, overriding the claims of a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act.

16 Jun 2026

The petitioner, the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-I, Employees' Provident Fund Organisation, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 o...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Delivers Order on Writ Petitions Challenging DGFT Policy Circulars on SEIS Eligibility and Show Cause Notices. The Court Addresses the Ultra Vires Nature of Circulars No. 06/2018 and 08/2018 under Foreign Trade Policy 2015-2020.

25 Apr 2024

Two writ petitions were filed before the Karnataka High Court challenging the validity of Policy Circulars No. 06/2018 dated 22.05.2018 and No. 08/201...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Industrial Development — Petitioners Failed to Show Violation of Statutory Provisions. The Court held that the acquisition under the KIAD Act, 1966 was valid and the petitioners were not entitled to higher compensation as they had already received enhanced compensation under a consent award.

3 Jun 2019

The petitioners, Smt. Kempamma and others, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Non-Payment of Compensation for Eucalyptus Trees Under KIADB Acquisition — Condition No.4 of Circular Dated 19.07.2001 Quashed as Arbitrary and Unreasonable. The court held that excluding eucalyptus trees from compensation violates Article 300A of the Constitution and principles of natural justice.

16 Jan 2019

The petitioners, land-losers whose lands were acquired by the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (KIADB) for formation of an industrial layou...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Retired Professor's Writ Petition for Interest on Delayed Pension and DCRG Payments. Recovery of amounts from pension and DCRG without notice held illegal under Article 300A of the Constitution of India.

1 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Sri F.J.M. Crasta, a retired Professor in Physics from St. Aloysius College, Mangalore, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Airport Project Despite Procedural Lapses. Court Holds That Dispensation of Section 5A Inquiry Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Was Unjustified but Refuses to Quash Notification in Public Interest.

5 May 2017

The two writ petitions were filed by M/s. Suretech Hospital & Research Centre Limited and M/s. Vighnaharta Builders and Developers challenging land ac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Recovery of Excess Salary Paid to Employees of Maharashtra Gramin Bank Due to Mistake. Recovery of excess payment made due to wrong fixation of pay scale is permissible under Regulation 20 of the Maharashtra Gramin Bank (Officers and Employees) Service Regulations, 2010, and the principle of no recovery does not apply when the employee had knowledge of the mistake.

17 Feb 2017

The petitioners, employees of Maharashtra Gramin Bank, were paid excess salary due to a wrong fixation of their pay scale. The bank issued notices see...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Market Fee on Copra as Not Notified Agricultural Produce Under APMC Act. Explanation to Rule 32(1) of Goa APMC Rules Held Ultra Vires as Copra Not in Schedule to Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963.

22 Jul 2016

The petitioners, Marico Industries Ltd. and Jude Linhares, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the demand for market...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Structures by Municipal Corporation. Petitioners failed to establish legal right to encroached public property; demolition held valid under Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976.

14 Jun 2016

The case involves two sets of writ petitions filed by individuals (Asif Pasha and others, and Nasir Khan and others) against the Commissioner of Mysor...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Landowner's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — No Entitlement to Enhanced Compensation for Trees on Acquired Land. The court held that the appellant, whose land was acquired for a highway project, was not entitled to separate compensation for trees as the land was already acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and the award included compensation for the land and improvements.

24 Jul 2013

The appellant, Sri Sannarangappa, owned land bearing Sy.No. 54/2 in Agrahara Koratagere Taluk, Tumkur District, which he purchased on 1.1.1979. Trees ...

18 19 20 21 22

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)