Search Results for "ACB investigation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "ACB investigation"

361 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 361 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging ED Summons Under PMLA — Holds Section 50 Summons Not Subject to Territorial Restrictions of CrPC. Court rules that Section 50 of PMLA is a standalone provision for summoning persons for inquiry, not governed by Sections 160 or 91 CrPC, and that the ED's power to summon is not territorially limited to the person's domicile.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed two criminal appeals filed by Abhishek Banerjee and Rujira Banerjee against the common order of the Delhi High Court dated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction and Unfair Trial. Sanctioning Authority Not Examined and Contents of Sanction Order Not Proved, Rendering Conviction Unsustainable Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

20 Sep 2024

The appellant, Devidas Jagannath Joshi, was convicted by the Special Court (ACB), Nagpur, for offences under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Trial Court Order Recalling Complainant in Corruption Case — Recalling Witness After Defence Disclosure Impermissible to Fill Lacunae Under Section 311 CrPC. The court held that the power under Section 311 CrPC cannot be exercised to fill lacunae in prosecution evidence after the accused has disclosed her defence in written notes of arguments under Section 314 CrPC.

13 Jul 2021

The petitioner, Nayna Rajan Guhagarkar, was facing prosecution for offences punishable under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corru...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs Against Retired Government Officer in Irrigation Scam Due to Lack of Sanction for Prosecution. Sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is mandatory and refusal by competent authority bars prosecution.

17 Feb 2021

The petitioner, Chandan Tulsiram Jibhakate, a retired Senior Divisional Account Officer, was implicated in five FIRs (Crime Nos. 540/2017, 542/2017, 6...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Customs Sepoy for Disproportionate Assets and Wife for Abetment. Assets worth ₹1.15 crore found disproportionate to known income; wife convicted for aiding acquisition under Section 109 IPC read with Prevention of Corruption Act.

27 Oct 2020

The case involves two appeals by Suresh Vinayak Morajkar (a Sepoy in the Customs & Central Excise Department) and his wife Sushma Suresh Morajkar agai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

31 Mar 2016

The appellant, Vinod s/o Savalaram Kanadkhedkar, was a junior clerk in the Tahsil office, Nanded. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Nanded in Spe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

25 Aug 2015

The appellant, Shashikant Piraji Sonawane, was convicted by the Special Judge for Greater Bombay under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Corruption Case Against Customs Officers for Lack of Valid Sanction. Prosecution under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Indian Penal Code, 1860 fails as prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC and Section 19 of PC Act was mandatory for acts done in discharge of official duty.

29 Aug 2012

The petitioners, nine customs officers, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Article 226 of the Constitution...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish essential ingredients.

8 May 2012

The case involves two appeals against the judgment of the Special Court, Khamgaon, convicting the appellants under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with Sect...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Against Politician for Alleged Disproportionate Assets — No Prima Facie Case Made Out. Petitioner failed to provide credible material to justify investigation under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

21 Jul 2011

The petitioner, an RTI activist, filed a PIL in the Bombay High Court alleging that respondent 9, a politician and former Home Minister of Maharashtra...

18 19 20 21 22

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)