Search Results for "1925"

691 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 691 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Revocation of Probate in Indian Succession Act Case Due to Lack of Caveatable Interest and Proof of Adoption. Allegations of Fraud and Non-Service of Citation on Heirs Fail as Petitioner Fails to Establish Locus Standi and Execution of Will is Upheld.

The Bombay High Court heard a miscellaneous petition filed by the nephew of a deceased woman seeking revocation of a probate granted in favor of the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Revoke Probate — Consent to Probate Bars Subsequent Challenge to Will's Genuineness. Failure to Administer Estate Does Not Warrant Revocation of Probate; Remedy Lies in Removal of Executor.

The appeal arose from an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing a Miscellaneous Petition for revocation of probate grante...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Probate of Will in Testamentary Suit, Upholds Execution Despite Handwritten Additions and Suspicious Circumstances. Propounders Discharged Burden of Proof Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 by Examining Attesting Witness and Explaining Circumstances.

The plaintiffs, Kirit N. Damania and Shantaram V. Pikale, executors named in the Will of Shashikala Baburao Alandkar, sought probate of the Will dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Will Dispute Case — High Court Erred in Interfering with Concurrent Findings of Fact. Will Execution Proved Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 65(c) of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The case involves a dispute over the validity of a Will dated 30.04.1980 executed by Chandu Ram in favor of his grandsons (sons of defendant No.5 Soha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Probate of Will in Favor of Propounder Despite Allegations of Undue Influence. Court holds that propounder discharged burden of proving due execution and testamentary capacity under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The plaintiff, Janki Suresh Bhandoola, as the sole executrix named in the last will and testament of Sushiladevi T. Parsani (the testatrix), filed a s...