Search Results for "workmen status"

570 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 570 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Challenging High Court’s Order Dismissing Absorption Claims of Temporary LIC Workers. The Court interprets the compromise reached in earlier SLP and the distinction between absorption and recruitment under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

This group of civil appeals by various employee associations challenged the Delhi High Court's common judgment dismissing their appeals and affirming ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reviews Industrial Dispute Over Contract Labour Wages and Settlement Binding Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. High Court Sustained Tribunal Award on Substantive Issues but Remanded for Individual Wage Scale Determination Due to Tribunal's Failure to Apply Basis to Facts.

The dispute originated from a Direct Action notice raised by the Oil Field Employees Association on 26 August 2016, representing workmen engaged by co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trade Union's Petition Challenging Rejection of Interim Relief in Transfer Dispute. Industrial Court's Refusal to Stay Transfer Orders Upheld as No Prima Facie Case of Unfair Labour Practice Established Under MRTU and PULP Act.

The petitioner, Engineering Workers Association, a registered trade union, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Management's Appeal in Labour Dispute Over Recognition of Protected Workmen. Single Judge's Order Set Aside as Management Has Discretion Under Section 33 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The case involves a writ appeal filed by the Management, M/s. Fouress Engineering (India) Ltd., challenging an order of a Single Judge of the High Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Alleging Unfair Labour Practice by Employer. Company's denial of permanency to 15 workmen held not to constitute unfair labour practice under Item 6 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 as workmen failed to prove continuous service.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Association of General Workers, a trade union, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated November 20,...