Search Results for "wholly owned subsidiary"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "wholly owned subsidiary"

164 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 164 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Rules in Admiralty Jurisdiction Case: Cockette Marine Oil vs. OSV Beas Dolphin. Court Rejects Summary Judgment Amidst Insolvency Proceedings, Highlights Impact of IBC Moratorium on Maritime Claims.

23 Aug 2024

The Bombay High Court, under the Admiralty jurisdiction, considered an application for summary judgment filed by Cockette Marine Oil DMCC against OSV ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Assessee in Income Tax Case — Write-off of Advances and Expenses Held Allowable as Business Loss Under Section 28 of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that amounts advanced to a business associate in the course of business dealings and written off as irrecoverable are deductible as business loss.

9 Jun 2023

The appellant, Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd., a public limited company engaged in manufacturing and trading, filed an appeal under Section 206A of the In...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Central Excise Valuation Dispute Over Related Person Status. The court held that sales between subsidiaries of a common holding company do not constitute transactions with a 'related person' under Section 4(4)(c) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as there was no mutual interest in each other's business, applying the arm's length principle.

22 Mar 2023

The appeal arose from an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) concerning the valuation of excisable goods under th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Without Proper Application of Mind. Transfer of Transferable Development Rights (TDR) to Wholly Owned Subsidiary Held Not Taxable as Income Under Section 2(24) Read With Section 45 of the Act.

15 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Standard Industries Limited, is engaged in trading of textile goods and real estate development. It owned freehold land at Sewree, Mum...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Admiralty Suit for Arrest of Vessel — Sets Aside Ex-Parte Order of Arrest for Non-Disclosure of Material Facts. Court holds that a plaintiff seeking arrest of a vessel must make full and frank disclosure of all material facts, including the existence of an arbitration agreement and the vessel's status as a River-Sea Vessel under the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958.

19 Aug 2022

The case involves an appeal by the defendants, MT Pamboor 2 (the vessel) and Shiny Shipping & Logistics Private Limited, against an ex-parte order of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Section 201 Notice Against Petitioner in Income Tax TDS Case — No Payment Made to Non-Resident, No Obligation to Deduct Tax Under Section 195 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that the Income Tax Officer lacked jurisdiction to treat the petitioner as an assessee in default for non-deduction of tax on share purchase where no sum was paid or credited.

26 Feb 2022

The petitioner, Ingram Micro Inc., a company incorporated in the USA, challenged the jurisdiction of the Income Tax Officer (International Taxation) t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Yum! Restaurants (Marketing) Private Limited in Doctrine of Mutuality Case — Surplus from AMP Activities Held Taxable as Income. Contributions from Non-Beneficiaries and Lack of Complete Identity Between Contributors and Beneficiaries Defeats Claim of Mutuality Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

24 Apr 2020

The appeal arose from a dispute between Yum! Restaurants (Marketing) Private Limited (YRMPL), a wholly owned subsidiary of Yum! Restaurants (India) Pv...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Remands Oppression Petition in Share Allotment Dispute Under Sections 397/398 of Companies Act, 1956 — Preference Shareholder's Voting Rights and Validity of Allotments Require Reconsideration. The Court held that the allotments were made in compliance with Section 81(1A) but the High Court failed to properly assess the allegations of oppression, necessitating a fresh hearing by the Company Law Board.

10 May 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court which set aside an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) in a petition under Sections 397 and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation Between Casby CFS Pvt. Ltd. and Casby Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Under Section 394 of Companies Act, 1956 — Restructuring of Casby Group Approved. Court found the scheme fair, reasonable, and not contrary to public interest, with no objections from Regional Director.

19 Mar 2015

The judgment concerns a petition filed by Casby CFS Pvt. Ltd. (Transferor) and Casby Logistics Pvt. Ltd. (Transferee) seeking sanction of a scheme of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Service Tax on Onsite Work at Customer's Premises Under Export of Service Rules, 2005. The court held that onsite work at customer's premises abroad qualifies as 'Service Provided from India' under Rule 3(2)(a) of the Export of Service Rules, 2005, and the appellants are entitled to refund of service tax paid.

15 Sep 2014

The case involves appeals by Tech Mahindra Limited and other assessees against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CE...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)