Search Results for "visually impaired candidates"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "visually impaired candidates"

26 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 26 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Petitioner in TNPSC Group-IV Examination Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Signature Instructions. Non-Affixation of Signature or Thumb Impression on OMR Sheet Renders Answer Sheet Invalid Under TNPSC Instructions, and Court Cannot Relax Such Mandatory Rules Under Article 226.

7 Mar 2025

The petitioner, a locomotor disabled person with 62% disability, appeared for the Combined Civil Services Examination-IV (Group-IV) conducted by the T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Visually Impaired Candidate to Choose Scribe with Higher Qualification in MPSC Exam — Reasonable Accommodation Under Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. The court interpreted 'one step below' in the Guidelines of 2021 to mean one step below the candidate's own qualification, not the minimum qualification for the post, to give effect to the principle of reasonable accommodation.

22 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Rohit Vishnu Gaikwad, a 100% visually impaired individual holding a Bachelor of Arts degree, applied for posts advertised by the Mahar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs CLAT Consortium to Follow Disability Rights Guidelines for Scribe Facilities in Competitive Examinations. The Court held that restricting scribe facilities only to candidates with benchmark disabilities violates the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016, and examination bodies must provide reasonable accommodation including scribes and compensatory time as per statutory guidelines.

17 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court of India addressed a writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution by a disability rights activist challenging certain co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Gram Panchayat Adhikari Recruitment Dispute — Waiting List Not Permissible Under 2015 Rules. Division Bench of Allahabad High Court erred in directing consideration of candidates beyond the select list forwarded by the Commission under the Uttar Pradesh Direct Recruitment to Group 'C' Posts (Mode and Procedure) Rules, 2015.

12 Dec 2022

The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed against the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court's order directing consideration of candidates beyond the se...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Gram Panchayat Adhikari Recruitment Dispute — Waiting List Not Permissible Under 2015 Rules. Division Bench erred in directing consideration of candidates beyond the select list as 2015 Rules override 1978 Rules and do not provide for a waiting list.

12 Dec 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court Division Bench. The dispute...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Teacher Recruitment Eligibility Dispute — Proviso to Rule 266(3) of Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996 Held Not Surviving Substitution. The Court held that the proviso allowing candidates who had appeared for B.S.T.C. examination to apply did not survive the substitution of Rule 266(3) by notification dated 11.5.2011, and the respondent was ineligible as he did not possess the qualification on the cut-off date.

21 Aug 2019

The case involves a dispute over the eligibility of a candidate for the post of Teacher Grade III in Rajasthan. The State of Rajasthan issued an adver...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recruitment Advertisement of District Courts for Violating Disability Reservation Law. High Court on Administrative Side Held to be 'Government Establishment' under Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016; Directed to Identify Posts and Provide 4% Reservation.

3 May 2018

The Bombay High Court heard two petitions together: a writ petition by the National Federation of the Blind Maharashtra and a public interest litigati...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds CAT Order Directing Consideration of Disabled Candidate for Civil Services — Failure to Provide Scribe for Written Examination Violates Rights Under Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995. The court held that the denial of a scribe to a visually impaired candidate amounts to discrimination and violates Section 39 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995.

27 Oct 2014

The Union of India filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 12.12.2013 passed by the C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Visually Impaired Peon Against Termination Due to 100% Disability. Holds That 40% Minimum Disability Requirement Under Advertisement Cannot Override Statutory Provisions of Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995.

25 Aug 2014

The petitioner, Patel Suleman Gaibi, who is 100% visually disabled, applied for the post of peon in the Irrigation Department of the State of Maharash...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Restriction of 3% Reservation for Physically Handicapped in PG Medical Admissions to Locomotory Disability Only. Visually Impaired Candidate Cannot Claim Reservation as Functional Requirements of Medical Course Justify Classification Under Article 14.

3 Sep 2013

The petitioner, Dr. Syed Abdul Wahab Abdul Aziz, a visually impaired medical officer employed by the State of Maharashtra, challenged the norms restri...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)