Search Results for "visual and phonetic test"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "visual and phonetic test"

48 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 48 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. Registered Trademark 'SACU-V' for Heart Failure Drug Protected Against Deceptively Similar Mark 'SACV' for Same Composition Pharmaceutical Product.

3 Sep 2024

The Plaintiff, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd., is engaged in manufacturing and sale of pharmaceutical preparations. It adopted the trademark 'SACU-V' i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case — Defendant's Logo Held Deceptively Similar to Plaintiff's Registered Logo. Well-known mark entitled to protection across classes under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

30 Jun 2016

The Plaintiff, Reliance Industries Ltd., filed a suit seeking injunctive reliefs against the Defendant, Concord Enviro Systems Pvt. Ltd., alleging inf...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Parksons Cartamundi Pvt. Ltd. v. Suresh Kumar Jasraj Burad. The court found that the marks 'MERELANE' and 'MARICELL' are deceptively similar and granted an interim injunction restraining the defendant from using the mark 'MARICELL'.

21 Mar 2012

The appellant, Parksons Cartamundi Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for infringement of its registered trademark 'MERELANE' and for passing off against the res...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'EVANOVA' vs 'ECONOVA' for Pharmaceutical Products. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Under Section 29 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

21 Jan 2014

The Plaintiff, Charak Pharma Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. seeking a perpetual injunction restraining the Defendant fr...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Rectification of Trade Mark Registrations for 'WHISPER' and 'ALWAYS' Marks — Petitioner's Prior Use and Well-Known Status Established, Respondent's Registration Cancelled.

6 Jan 2026

The petitioner, The Procter & Gamble Company, a multinational corporation, filed three original petitions under Sections 47, 57, and 125 of the Trade ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Temporary Injunction in Trade Mark Infringement Suit — 'JAL DROP' Found Deceptively Similar to Registered Mark 'JEEVAN DROP'. The court affirmed that phonetic and conceptual similarity between marks for identical goods (Sodium Hypochlorite Solution) constitutes infringement under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

8 Feb 2016

The respondent, Mauli Chemicals Industries, a registered partnership firm manufacturing Sodium Hypochlorite Solution used as a drinking water disinfec...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Defendant restrained from using mark 'cothagiri' for coffee products as it is phonetically and structurally similar to plaintiff's registered trademark 'Cothas'.

14 Sep 2016

The case involves a trademark infringement dispute between two coffee companies. The appellant, M/s Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd., was the defendant in the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Vacation of Interim Injunction in 'RACIRAFT' vs 'ESIRAFT' Trademark Case. The Court Examines Whether the Impugned Mark 'ESIRAFT' is Deceptively Similar to the Registered Mark 'RACIRAFT' for Pharmaceutical Products, Applying the Anti-Dissection Rule and Principles of Phonetic and Visual Similarity.

8 Apr 2026

The case involved a commercial appeal filed by Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. against an order of the Single Judge vacating an ad-interim injuncti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — No Deceptive Similarity Between STIMULIV and STIMULET for Different Pharmaceutical Products. The court held that the mark 'STIMULET' used for an allopathic breast cancer drug does not infringe the registered mark 'STIMULIV' used for Ayurvedic liver medicines due to differences in nature, trade channels, and customers under Section 29(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

20 Jan 2023

The case involves a trademark infringement and passing off dispute between two pharmaceutical companies. The appellant, Corona Remedies Private Limite...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case Involving Pharmaceutical Marks LOX and XYLOX. Court finds prima facie that Defendants' XYLOX marks are deceptively similar to Plaintiff's LOX family of marks, and that the defence of common origin or acquiescence is not made out.

16 Sep 2014

The Plaintiff, Neon Laboratories Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Themis Medicare Ltd. (Defendant No. 1) and Ciro...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)