Search Results for "vaginal swab"

150 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 150 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support the prosecution case.

The appellants, Mangesh Vitthal Waghmare and Devidas Balchandra Rathod, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Washim, in Atrocity Case No. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in POCSO Case for Rape of Six-Year-Old Girl — Life Sentence Confirmed Based on Victim's Testimony and DNA Evidence. Victim's credible testimony and DNA evidence sufficient to sustain conviction under Section 376AB IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act.

The case involves an appeal against conviction for the rape of a six-year-old girl. The victim, a first-standard student, was returning from a drawing...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Unreliable Victim Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(2)(g), 366A, 292, 500, 506(II) IPC and Section 67 IT Act Set Aside.

The case involves two appeals against conviction for gang rape and other offences. The prosecution alleged that on 16 May 2011, the appellants and thr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376 and 506 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's evidence was inconsistent and medical evidence did not establish rape.

The appellant, Suresh Karbhari Wadge, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shrirampur, for offences under Sections 376 (rape) and 506 (crim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 376 IPC Where Accused Alleged False Implication and Consent. The Court Examined Whether Absence of Bodily Injuries Was Fatal to Prosecution Case Given Corroborating Medical Evidence of Fresh Hymen Tear and Semen Stains.

The present appeal arose from the judgment dated 28th January 2003 of the IInd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Sessions Case No. 58 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault of a Six-Year-Old Girl Under POCSO Act. Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Prompt FIR.

The appellant, Pravin S/o Suryabhanji Gube, was convicted by the learned Extra Joint Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur on 12.9.2018 in Special Child P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Inconclusive.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under Sections 376(2)(g), 452, 406, and 506 IPC read with Section 34 IPC. The appellants, Satish Say...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Based on Credible Testimony and Medical Evidence. Testimony of Victim Alone Sufficient for Conviction Under Section 376 IPC When Found Reliable and Corroborated by Medical Evidence.

The appellant, Vincent Fernandes, was convicted by the trial court under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code for committing rape on a 14-year-old gir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape of Minor Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Support Penetration and Witness Testimony Contained Material Contradictions.

The appellant, Sudam Ramnath Shelke, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik for the offence punishable under Section 376(2)(f) of the ...