Bombay High Court on Slum Evictions: Contractual Disputes to Be Raised Separately
19 Jan 2026The Petitioner filed a writ petition challenging eviction orders passed by the Slum Rehabilitation Authority and the Apex Grievance Redressal Committe...
Search Results for "vacate stay"
451 result(s) found
Found 451 result(s)
High Court
High Court Condemns Demolition by Municipal Corporation Under Guise of DCPR 2034 Redevelopment Scheme. Appeal from Order Dismisses Demolition as High-handed and Illegal Under Regulation 33(9) of Development Control and Promotion Regulation 2034.
4 Apr 2025The matter pertains to an appeal from order filed by M/s. Mehta & Co., a partnership firm through its partner Mr. Adarsh Varma, as original plaintiff,...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes High Court Order Vacating Stay in Contempt Proceedings Due to Overreach of Jurisdiction. The Court Held That Contempt Jurisdiction Under Article 215 and the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Must Not Be Used to Issue Supplemental Directions or Alter Original Orders, Emphasizing the Special and Rare Nature of Such Power.
30 Jan 2024The appeal before the Supreme Court centered on the limits of contempt jurisdiction under Article 215 of the Constitution of India and the Contempt of...
- 376
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Landlord's Revision Petition in Rent Control Eviction Case — Bonafide Requirement Not Proven. Landlord failed to establish that the schedule property was reasonably and bonafidely required for his own use and occupation under Section 27(2)(r) of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999.
11 Aug 2023The petitioner, Sri Krishnaprasad A., filed an eviction petition under Section 27(2)(r) of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999, before the Chief Judge, Small...
- 66
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Air India Disinvestment and Transfer of Employees. Transfer of undertaking under Section 25FF of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not require consent of workmen and continuity of service is protected.
13 Mar 2023The petitioners, three trade unions representing employees of Air India and its subsidiaries, filed writ petitions challenging the disinvestment of Ai...
- 18
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Demolition of Structures Under MHADA Act — Held That Occupants in Possession Prior to Cut-Off Date Are Entitled to Rehabilitation and Cannot Be Evicted Without Following Due Process Under Section 33 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Re-development) Act, 1971.
19 Jul 2022The judgment pertains to a group of writ petitions filed by occupants of structures in slum areas in Mumbai, challenging the demolition of their dwell...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Workers Association in Land Allotment Dispute Under Modified Voluntary Retirement Scheme. Court held that denial of plots to 318 ex-employees while granting to 134 similarly situated ex-employees violated Article 14 of the Constitution, as there was no rational basis for differentiation and state instrumentalities must act non-discriminatorily in welfare measures.
26 Oct 2021The dispute arose from the closure of Azam Jahi Mills in 2002, where 452 employees took voluntary retirement under a Modified Voluntary Retirement Sch...
- 188
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition in Redevelopment Dispute — Dissenting Member Cannot Obstruct Majority Decision for Dilapidated Building. Court Appoints Arbitrator Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to Resolve Dispute Between Developer, Society, and Dissenting Member.
12 Mar 2021The Bombay High Court dealt with an arbitration petition filed by Chirag Infra Projects Pvt Ltd, the developer, against Vijay Jwala Cooperative Housin...
- 16
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Rent Control and Trespass Dispute — Appellant Fails to Establish Tenancy Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. The court upheld concurrent findings that the appellant was a trespasser and not a tenant, as he failed to prove any landlord-tenant relationship with the respondents.
23 Jan 2014The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendant-appellant, Devendra S/o Chandanmal Ajmera, against the judgment and order dated 6.9.2013 pass...
- 58
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Construction in Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. Court upholds demolition of structures built without valid permission under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, holding that no prior notice is required when construction is patently illegal.
30 Nov -0001The petitioner, AM Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition of certain structures by the Municipal Corporation...
- 201
