Search Results for "unregistered award"

78 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 78 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA Due to Pending Title Dispute. Availability of Alternate Civil Suit Remedy Renders Writ Petition Under Article 227 Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, M/s. Blue Heaven Co-op Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Execution Petition for Unregistered Arbitral Award in Property Dispute. Registration of Award Under Section 17 of Registration Act, 1908 Held Mandatory for Creating Rights in Immovable Property Worth Over Rs.100.

The case involves a dispute over the execution of an arbitral award that partitioned immovable properties. The original plaintiffs (respondents) had f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Appointment of Arbitrator Due to Unstamped Arbitration Agreement. Court Must Impound Unstamped Agreement Under Stamp Act Before Proceeding Under Section 11 of Arbitration Act.

The appeal arose from a sub-contract between Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. (appellant) and Coastal Marine Constructions & Engineering Ltd. (respondent) for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Bank in Possession Suit, Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Possession and Mesne Profits. Counterclaim for Specific Performance of Sale Contract Dismissed as Unenforceable Due to Lack of Registered Agreement and Failure to Prove Readiness and Willingness.

The case involves a dispute over immovable property, Municipal House No.9 at Ahmedpur, consisting of a godown, three rooms, and open space on a plot o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Rejection of Application to Reopen Evidence in Civil Suit. Trial Court's Discretion Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC Upheld as Defendants Had Sufficient Opportunity to Cross-Examine Witness.

The petitioners, who were the original defendants in Special Civil Suit No.74/2010 pending before the Second Joint Civil Judge, Satara, filed four wri...