Search Results for "unnatural sexual intercourse"

132 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 132 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act and Section 377 IPC Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for unnatural sex and caste-based atrocity set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dattatraya Ramchandra Sutar, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, for offences under Section 377 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Accused in POCSO Case Due to Lack of Medical Evidence and Non-Examination of Material Witness. Conviction under Sections 363, 377 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove penetrative sexual assault beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dilip Jaglal Warkhede, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO Act) and Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special Criminal Case No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 377 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of POCSO Act set aside as testimonies of child victims were contradictory and unsupported by medical evidence.

The appellant, Navin Dhaniram Baraiye, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special POCSO Case No. 218/2016 for offences under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in POCSO Case for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault on 9-Year-Old Boy. Court holds that testimony of child victim alone, if credible, is sufficient for conviction under Section 4 of POCSO Act, 2012.

The appellant, Mahesh Sambhaji Chafle, was convicted by the Special Judge, Hingoli, under Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reviews Conviction of Assistant Teacher Under Sections 376, 354, and 366 IPC. Appeal Challenges Trial Court's Findings on Alleged Rape and Outraging Modesty of a Minor Student.

The appellant, a mathematics teacher at Yashoyash School, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 366 read with 34, 376, and 354 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Material Contradictions and Improbable Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Testimony of Prosecutrix Lacks Credibility and Medical Evidence Does Not Support Forcible Intercourse.

The appellant, Hiraman Jangu Uike, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Sections 376 and 448 of the Indian Penal Code, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder, Kidnapping, and Unnatural Offense Case. Circumstantial evidence including last seen together and recovery of body at instance of accused sufficient to prove guilt under Sections 302, 363, 377, 201 IPC.

The appellant, Vaibhav Shantaram More, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sewree, Mumbai, for offenses under Sections 363, 377, 302, and ...