Search Results for "unconstitutional"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "unconstitutional"

682 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 682 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Title Dispute Against Government — Holds That Government Cannot Unilaterally Resume Land Without Following Due Process and Payment of Compensation. Court Restores Trial Court Decree Declaring Appellants' Title Based on Valid Sale Deed and Pattadar Passbook, Setting Aside High Court's Reversal.

24 Mar 2025

The case involves a dispute over 3.34 acres of land in Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh. The appellants claimed title through a chain of transactions ...

High Court

Challenge to 10% Weightage for GATE Score in Recruitment Process. Constitutional Validity of GATE Score Weightage in Public Sector Recruitment – Bombay High Court Quashes Unconstitutional Conditions

17 Mar 2025

GATE Score Weightage – Petitioners challenged the 10% weightage given to the Graduate Aptitude Test in Engineering (GATE) score in the recruitment ...

High Court

Retrospective Effect of Unconstitutional Provisions – Arbitral Tribunal Directed to Reconsider Solatium – Judicial Discretion Under Section 34(4) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Upheld

27 Feb 2025

National Highways Act, 1956 – Section 3(J) Declared Unconstitutional – Arbitral Award Remitted for Solatium Consideration – Writ Petition Dismis...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition Under NH Act for Highway Widening — Removal of Difficulties Order 2015 Upheld. NH Act, 1956 prevails over 2013 Act; technical approval not a condition precedent for Section 3-A notification.

30 Jan 2025

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by landowners challenging the land acquisition proceedings for the four-laning of National Highway 74...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 as Valid Regulatory Legislation. High Court erred in striking down entire Act; provisions conflicting with UGC Act are severable.

5 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Allahabad High Court's judgment striking down the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench the Question Whether Mere Membership of a Banned Organization is Punishable Under Section 10 of UAPA, 1967 — Earlier Decisions in Arup Bhuyan and Raneef Holding That Mere Membership Does Not Incriminate Without Violence or Incitement Are Reconsidered as Union of India Was Not Heard.

24 Mar 2023

This judgment arises from a reference to a larger Bench of the Supreme Court of India, questioning the correctness of the decisions in Arup Bhuyan v. ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Special Road Tax Provisions in Himachal Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act on Reference to Larger Bench. The Court Examines Whether Levy Under Section 3-A(3) Constitutes a Tax or Penalty and Falls Within State Legislative Competence Under Entries 56 and 57 of List II of the Seventh Schedule.

13 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from a challenge by public transport operators to the constitutional validity of certain provisions of the Himachal Pradesh Motor Ve...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Upholds Section 10(26AAA) of Income Tax Act, 1961 in Sikkim Tax Exemption Challenge. Gender-Based Proviso Denying Exemption to Sikkimese Women Marrying Non-Sikkimese Struck Down as Unconstitutional.

13 Jan 2023

The judgment concerns a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the constitutional validity of Section 10(26AAA) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Notification Levying Central Excise on Tobacco Products — Notification No.3/2019-Central Excise dated 06.07.2019 held valid and within powers under Section 5A of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court held that the government has the power to modify or withdraw exemptions in public interest and that promissory estoppel does not apply to legislative functions.

21 Sep 2022

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by manufacturers and dealers of tobacco and tobacco products, challenging Notification No.3/2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Contempt of Courts Act Provisions as Unconstitutional — Petitioner's Allegations of Violation of Natural Justice and Fundamental Rights Rejected. Court holds that Sections 2(c), 12, 14 and 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 are not unconstitutional and that the contempt proceedings against the petitioner are not liable to be quashed.

4 May 2017

The petitioner, Satish Mahadeorao Uke, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking a dec...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)