Search Results for "uncommunicated adverse remarks"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "uncommunicated adverse remarks"

30 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 30 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Promotion Claim Due to Non-Communication of APARs — IRCTC Promotion Policy Benchmark Quashed as Arbitrary. The court held that non-communication of Annual Performance Appraisal Reports before using them to deny promotion violates principles of natural justice, and directed reconsideration of promotion without considering uncommunicated APARs.

5 Jan 2026

The petitioner, Susheel Patil, an employee of Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd (IRCTC), filed a petition under Articles 14, 16 and ...

Supreme Court

High Court Upholds Screening Committee's Decision in IAS Officer Promotion Case Due to Lack of ACRs and Unsatisfactory Performance. Promotion to Chief Secretary Grade Denied as Officer Failed to Meet Guidelines Under IAS (Pay) Rules, 2016, with Review Committee Properly Considering Adverse Remarks and Unauthorized Absence.

23 Apr 2025

The dispute involved an IAS officer of the 1991 batch in the Kerala cadre, seeking promotion to the Chief Secretary grade under the IAS (Pay) Rules, 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Judicial Officer Challenging Compulsory Retirement. Non-Communication of Adverse Remarks in ACRs Violates Natural Justice, Order Set Aside.

8 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Smt. Shraddha Vinod Deo, was appointed as a Judicial Magistrate First Class on 1st September 1990 and served at various places includi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Superannuation at 60 Years — Upholds Government's Refusal to Extend Service Age Based on Confidential Report Grades. Court holds that clause 11(4) of Government Resolution dated 05.03.2011 requiring minimum three 'A' and two 'B+' grades in preceding five years is mandatory and not arbitrary.

29 Oct 2015

The petitioner, Dr. Reeta Harode, a government employee, reached the age of 60 years on 31.10.2013. She sought extension of her superannuation age up ...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Denial of Promotion Based on Uncommunicated Adverse Remarks — Violation of Natural Justice. Non-communication of adverse entries in ACR renders them void and cannot be used to deny promotion under Article 226 of the Constitution.

18 Feb 2026

The petitioner, F H Shaikh, joined service on 10/05/1982 as a Class-II officer (Principal) under the Director of Employment and Training, Gujarat Stat...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Termination of Block Development Officer for Non-Communication of Adverse Remarks. Rule 5 of Temporary Civil Services Rules, 1949 cannot be applied to a deemed confirmed employee without following principles of natural justice.

23 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Shri Uttam K. Pal, joined the services of the State of Goa as an Assistant Teacher on 4.1.1982. With permission from the Directorate o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officer for Inadequate Disposal Record. Rule 10(4)(a)(i) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 applied to compulsorily retire an Additional District Judge based on consistently inadequate disposal and adverse remarks.

14 Sep 2006

The petitioner, Govind Laxmanrao Edke, was a judicial officer who entered service as a Civil Judge, Junior Division in June 1980, was promoted to Civi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officers in Public Interest — Screening Committee's Evaluation Not Arbitrary or Perverse. Rule 74(b)(ii) of Jharkhand Service Code, 2001, allows compulsory retirement after 30 years of service or 50 years of age in public interest; court found no mala fides or perversity in the decision.

27 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by erstwhile judicial officers of Jharkhand challenging their compulsory retirement under Rule 74...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of District Judge for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice. Premature Retirement Order Set Aside as Review Committee Failed to Consider Entire Service Record and Adverse Remarks Were Not Communicated.

25 Nov 2019

The Petitioner, a District Judge, challenged his compulsory retirement from service on attaining the age of 55 years, by an order dated 12/07/2018. He...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank of Baroda's Appeal Against High Court Order Quashing Termination of Probationary Employee. Unsatisfactory Performance and Misconduct During Probation Justify Termination Without Stigma.

1 Jan 2026

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Calcutta High Court which allowed the writ petition of the respondent-employee and quashed his termin...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)