Search Results for "uncommunicated adverse entries"

26 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 26 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Doctor Denied Promotion in Indian Railway Medical Service Due to Inadequate Grading. Selection Committee's Assessment of Annual Confidential Reports Held to Be Objective and Not Vitiated by Bias or Arbitrariness.

The appellant, Dr. Indira Saranath, was a doctor in the Indian Railway Medical Service (IRMS). She sought promotion to the post of Chief Medical Direc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Judicial Officer Challenging Compulsory Retirement. Non-Communication of Adverse Remarks in ACRs Violates Natural Justice, Order Set Aside.

The petitioner, Smt. Shraddha Vinod Deo, was appointed as a Judicial Magistrate First Class on 1st September 1990 and served at various places includi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Municipal Employee Before Age 58 — Violation of Service Regulations. Compulsory retirement at age 55 without following Regulation 25(3) of BMC Service Regulations, 1989 set aside as arbitrary and illegal.

The Petitioner, Smt. Yashoda Bapu Jadhav, was an employee of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (BMC). She was compulsorily retired at the ag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Denial of Promotion Based on Uncommunicated Adverse Remarks — Violation of Natural Justice. Non-communication of adverse entries in ACR renders them void and cannot be used to deny promotion under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, F H Shaikh, joined service on 10/05/1982 as a Class-II officer (Principal) under the Director of Employment and Training, Gujarat Stat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Petition Challenging Adverse Remarks in Annual Confidential Reports Due to Delayed Communication - Delayed communication of ACRs violates natural justice, making adverse remarks inadmissible for promotion consideration under Government Resolution dated 31 March 1989.

The dispute involved a petition filed by a retired Office Superintendent against the State of Gujarat and another respondent, challenging adverse rema...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Promotion Dispute Due to Non-Communication of APAR Entries. Failure to Disclose Annual Performance Appraisal Report Entries Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Law Laid Down in Dev Dutt and Sukhdev Singh.

The dispute arose from the appellant's claim for promotion from Scale III to Scale IV in United India Insurance Co Ltd for the year 2014-2015. The app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition on Premature Retirement and the Role of Adverse ACRs in Service Tenure. Court clarifies the role of Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) and their impact on premature retirement under Rule 3.26(d) of Punjab Civil Services Rules.

The petitioner, a Senior Assistant in the Cooperative Department, challenges his premature retirement under Rule 3.26(d) of the Punjab Civil Services ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officer for Inadequate Disposal Record. Rule 10(4)(a)(i) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 applied to compulsorily retire an Additional District Judge based on consistently inadequate disposal and adverse remarks.

The petitioner, Govind Laxmanrao Edke, was a judicial officer who entered service as a Civil Judge, Junior Division in June 1980, was promoted to Civi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order of IRS Officer Due to Bias and Malice. Compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of Fundamental Rules, 1922, set aside as it was punitive, violated natural justice due to biased committee members, and disregarded clean service record.

The dispute involved an Indian Revenue Service officer challenging his compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules, ordered three ...