Search Results for "unauthorized trades"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "unauthorized trades"

28 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 28 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Unconditional Stay of Arbitral Award Due to Stamp Duty Deficiency. Arbitration Agreement in Unstamped Member Client Agreement Held Void Ab Initio Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958.

29 Nov 2023

The petitioner, M/s. Anand Rathi Share & Stock Brokers Ltd., challenged an order passed by the District Judge-1, Amravati, which granted unconditional...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Rejection of Arbitration Petitions in Commodity Brokerage Dispute — Holds That Non-Signatories Can Be Referred to Arbitration Under Group of Companies Doctrine. The court applied the group of companies doctrine to refer non-signatory appellants to arbitration, finding that they were closely connected to the signatory broker and the transactions were indivisible.

7 Apr 2021

The case involves four appeals filed by members of the Madgavkar family (Anil V. Madgavkar, Celsa A. Madgavkar, Ayesha A. Madgavkar, and Aakash A. Mad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Commodity Brokerage Dispute — Upholds Tribunal's Finding That Broker Failed to Prove Client's Liability. Member Client Agreement and Running Account Basis Did Not Shift Burden of Proof to Client Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Bonanza Commodities Brokers Pvt. Ltd., a member of Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd. (MCX), filed a petition under Section 34 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Client Against Trading Member for Unauthorized Trades. Award of Rs.6,59,634.54 with interest upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

19 Nov 2012

The petitioner, Angel Broking Private Limited, a trading member, challenged an arbitral award dated 29 August 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator appoint...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Upholds Appellate Award Allowing Claims for Debit Balance. Client Failed to Prove Unauthorized Trades or Misappropriation of Shares; Burden of Proof Not Discharged Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

1 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Shankarlal V. Keswani, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitration Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Upholds Award for Losses Due to Unauthorized Squaring Off of Positions. The court held that the arbitral award was based on evidence and reasoning, and no ground for interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was made out.

5 Mar 2012

The case involves a challenge by HSBC InvestDirect Securities (India) Ltd. (formerly IL & FS Investsmart Securities Ltd.), a stock broker registered w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Group Adjustment Letter Authorized Set-off of Losses Across Family Accounts. The court upheld the arbitral award rejecting the client's claim for unauthorized trades and wrongful disposal of shares, holding that the group adjustment letter was binding and the client failed to prove unauthorized trades.

27 Feb 2012

The petitioner, Manjula Arvind Thakkar, challenged an arbitral award dated 10 February 2010 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal constituted under the Byel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Indefinite Curfew Imposed Due to Burial Dispute in Mominpura Area. Court holds that curfew under Section 144 CrPC cannot be used as a permanent measure and must be proportionate to the threat.

12 Jul 2011

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench. The petit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Grounds Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Established. Court upholds award holding petitioner liable for unauthorized trades and failure to prove respondent's instructions.

4 Jan 2010

The petitioner, Sytematix Shares & Stocks (India) Ltd., a stockbroker, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Exchange Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court held that the arbitral award was not in conflict with public policy and did not suffer from patent illegality, as the tribunal's findings were based on evidence and were plausible.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, MPDA Associates Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)