Search Results for "unaccounted cash"

90 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 90 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Complainant's inconsistent evidence and lack of financial capacity led to upholding of acquittal under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Vikas Gopi Bhagat, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 28.5.2013 passed by the Judicial Magistrat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted. Accused Failed to Prove Defence of Blank Cheque Given as Security, Leading to Confirmation of Sentence Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The case arises from a complaint filed by the respondent (complainant) against the petitioner (accused) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

SPECIAL CASE NO. 3 OF 2001

The Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992, presided over by Justice Roshan Dalvi, heard Special Case No. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted; failure to show loan in income tax returns does not invalidate legally enforceable debt.

The appellant, Pushpa Sanchalal Kothari, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the acquitt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal and Convicts Accused Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Presumption Under Section 139 of NI Act Shifts Burden on Accused, Which Was Not Discharged.

The appellant, Mohammad Murtuza Mohammad Yusuf, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against the respondent, G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted. Trial Court Erred in Not Framing Proper Points of Determination and Ignoring Legal Presumption in Favour of Complainant.

The appellant, original complainant Sunil Thukral, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment and order dated 19/01/2011 of the Judicial Magistrate ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Criminal Appeal in Disproportionate Assets Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Appellant Challenges Conviction Alleging Miscalculation of Income and Improper Sanction Under Sections 13(1)(e) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, a former Electrical Attender in the Public Works Department, was convicted by the trial court under Section 13(1)(e) read with Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Conviction for Cheque Bounce Upheld. Dishonour of Cheque for Discharge of Existing Debt Attracts Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The criminal revision petition was filed by the accused-petitioner challenging the judgment dated 31.10.2012 passed by the II Addl. District and Sessi...