Search Results for "transmission tower"

57 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 57 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Notification and Order for Removal of Obstructions — Violation of Natural Justice. Order Under Section 16(1) of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 Quashed as Petitioners Were Not Heard.

The petitioners, Dalwadi Pramodkumar Dayarambhai and others, filed a writ petition before the Gujarat High Court challenging a notification published ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Intra-Court Appeal in High Tension Tower Erection Dispute on Patta Land. Court Directs Landowner to Seek Compensation Under Section 16(3) of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, Upholding Public Interest in Essential Services over Private Land Objections.

The dispute arose from the proposed erection of a high tension tower on patta land belonging to the appellant, Jaya Santhi, in Sethupattu Village, Tir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Telecom Infrastructure Charges Case Over Retrospective Application. Appellant's Circular Increasing Charges from 2009 Held Invalid as Yearly Payments Are Made Upfront, Making Retrospective Burden Unreasonable Under Interconnection Agreements.

The dispute arose from appeals filed by Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. challenging a judgment by the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Seeking to Bring Internet Streaming Under Cinematograph Act, 1952. Definition of 'cinematograph' under Section 2(c) does not include transmission through internet.

The petitioner, Mr. Padmanabh Shankar, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Panchayat Notice Against Telecom Tower Operator for Lack of Authority Under Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. Panchayat Cannot Interfere with Licensed Telecom Infrastructure Sharing as It Falls Under Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 and DoT Guidelines.

The petitioner, Tower Vision India Private Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act and licensed by the Ministry of Communications, Depar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Telecom Tower Installations on Cooperative Society Rooftops. Held that telecom towers are not structures requiring consent under Section 79A of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, and MCGM circular requiring consent is ultra vires.

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by residents and cooperative housing societies challenging the installation of telecom towers on the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Vodafone's Appeal on CENVAT Credit for Telecom Towers and Shelters. CENVAT Credit on Towers and Prefabricated Buildings Denied as They Are Immovable Property and Not Capital Goods Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

The Appellant, Vodafone India Ltd., filed appeals under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging SEBI's Power to Call Call Data Records. SEBI's Investigative Powers Under Section 11 of SEBI Act, 1992 Include Access to CDRs, and Such Access Does Not Violate Right to Privacy.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the Indian Council of Investors challenging the Securities and Exchange Bo...