Search Results for "temple expenses"

227 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 227 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Enhances Compensation for Electrocution Death Due to Negligence of Electricity Board — Applies Sarla Verma Multiplier and Adds Conventional Heads. The court held that the Electricity Board was negligent under res ipsa loquitur and awarded Rs.18,34,000/- with interest.

The appellants, legal heirs of Saravanan, filed an appeal against the judgment and decree in O.S. No.55 of 2021 passed by the Additional District Judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Frivolous PIL Seeking Multiple Unrelated Directions Including Anti-Organized Crime Unit, Cow Farms, and Cave Temple Commission. Petition Filed by Self-Styled Criminologist Lacks Factual Basis and Legal Foundation, Wasting Judicial Time.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Crimeophobia – A Criminology Firm through its founder, Snehil Dhall, who...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Trust's Application for Alienation of Immovable Property Under Section 36(1)(a) of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. Joint Charity Commissioner's Order Upheld as No Error of Law or Jurisdiction Found.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Megh Realty and Developers Private Limited against the order of the learned Single Judge dismissing...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal and Partly Allows Claimants' Appeal in Motor Accident Compensation Case. Multiplier applied as per Sarla Verma, future prospects granted at 40% for self-employed deceased, compensation recalculated.

The case arises from a motor accident claim for compensation. The deceased, a 25-year-old bachelor, died in a road accident involving a vehicle insure...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Petition for Want of Evidence. Claimant's Unrebutted Testimony and Medical Records Sufficient to Prove Accident and Injuries Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Sunith Kumar V., filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for injuries sustained ...