Search Results for "supplementary gratuity"

33 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 33 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal in Pension Dispute Under Bipartite Settlement and Pension Regulations. Employee Removed for Misconduct Entitled to Pension as Appellate Order Granting Terminal Benefits Attained Finality and He Completed Minimum Pensionable Service.

The dispute arose from the removal of an employee from service by United Commercial Bank following a disciplinary enquiry that found him guilty of rio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Termination of Employees for Illegal Strike and Misconduct Without Enquiry — Justified Under MRTU & PULP Act. Employer's Right to Lead Evidence Before Labour Court to Justify Dismissal Without Enquiry Upheld When Atmosphere of Terror Prevents Disciplinary Proceedings.

The case involves a writ petition filed by 22 ex-employees of M/s. Advani Oerlikon Ltd. challenging the judgment and order of the First Labour Court, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Validates Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes in Landmark Judgment. Upholding Equality Within Equality: Supreme Court Endorses State's Power to Sub-Classify Scheduled Castes for Targeted Reservation.

The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has upheld the constitutionality of sub-classifying Scheduled Castes for the purpose of reservati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Revision Against Summons for Offence Under Section 92 of Factories Act, 1948 for Alleged Violation of Rule 79-A(b) of Karnataka Factories Rules, 1969. Director Argues Lack of Vicarious Liability and Procedural Flaws, but Full Order Not Available.

The revision petition was filed by a director of Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing beverages, seeking to qua...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Amalgamation Notification for Lack of Consent — Amalgamation Under Section 44 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act Requires Consent of Both Market Committees. Withdrawal of Consent by One Committee Renders the Process Invalid.

The petitioners, Sopanrao Sathe (Chairman) and the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Malkapur, challenged a notification dated 17-01-2009 ...