Search Results for "supervisory allowance"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "supervisory allowance"

80 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 80 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Temporary Employees in Unfair Labour Practice Case Due to Erroneous Dismissal by Industrial Court. Industrial Court's Decision Quashed as It Failed to Consider Admissions and Merits Under Items 5, 6, 9, and 10 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

5 Mar 2026

The dispute involved multiple writ petitions filed by temporary employees against the Respondent, challenging the Industrial Court's dismissal of thei...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Municipal Corporation Challenging Industrial Court Order on Unfair Labour Practice. Withdrawal of incentive bonus without lawful revision held to be unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

28 Nov 2025

The Petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai through its General Manager of BEST, challenged the judgment and order dated 14 February 2008 ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Telecom Company in Industrial Dispute, Holding Regional Business Head Not a 'Workman' Under Industrial Disputes Act. Managerial and Supervisory Duties Exclude Employee from Section 2(s) Definition Despite Absence of Power to Appoint or Dismiss.

17 Apr 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s Bharti Airtel Limited against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court which had held that the respo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Management Appeals in Double Overtime Allowance Case for Supervisors. Supervisors Not Entitled to Double Over Time Allowance Under Service Rules.

15 Dec 2023

The case pertains to a dispute over the entitlement of Double Over Time Allowance to employees working as Supervisors in the Security Printing & Minti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds 2020 Tribunal Rules with Modifications to Ensure Judicial Independence. Court directs changes to Search-cum-Selection Committee composition and member qualifications to align with constitutional principles.

27 Nov 2020

The Supreme Court of India was called upon to decide the constitutional validity of the Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and other Authorities (Qualificat...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Labour Court Award in VSS Dispute — NMR Workers Found to Have Been Coerced into Voluntary Separation Scheme. The Court confirmed reinstatement with 70% back-wages under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, finding no perversity in the concurrent findings of fact.

12 Sep 2019

The case arose from a dispute between the General Manager, Electrical Rengali Hydro Electric Project, Orissa (appellant) and 90 NMR workers (responden...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Petition Challenging Transfer from Navi Mumbai to Mysore. Transfer Order Upheld as Valid Exercise of Employer's Right Under Contract of Service.

12 Mar 2018

The petitioner, Uday Shantikumar Dixit, joined Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (respondent no.1) on 23rd November 1981 as an Assistant Draughtsman and was later ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court Order Quashing Recovery of Excess Salary Paid Due to Employer's Mistake. Recovery of Rs.1,94,637/- from Retired Employee Set Aside as Employer's Inadvertence Cannot Be Visited on Employee.

1 Oct 2014

The respondent, Sou. Anjali Anil Tare, was appointed as a Lower Division Clerk (LDC) in 1977 and passed her lower division grade examination in 1980, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints. Summary jurisdiction under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act does not bar determination of disputed employer-employee relationship when status is prima facie established.

26 Aug 2010

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Birla Cotsyn (India) Ltd., the employer, challenging identical orders passed by the Labour Court a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Superannuation at 58 Years — Employee Promoted to Executive Cadre Not a Workman Under Industrial Disputes Act. Promotion to Assistant in Executive cadre removes employee from definition of 'workman' under Section 2(s) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, making complaint under MRTU & PULP Act not maintainable.

19 Jan 2005

The Petitioner, Shri Inthru Noronha, joined Ciba of India Limited (later Hindustan Ciba Geigy Limited) on 1 June 1965 as a typist and later became a P...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)