Search Results for "sudden movement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "sudden movement"

118 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 118 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Constitutionality of Prohibitory Orders Under Section 144 CrPC Restricting Public Assembly. Judgment Clarifies That Reasonable Restrictions on Speech and Assembly Must Be Just, Fair and Reasonable Under Articles 19 and 21.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court initiated a suo motu criminal writ petition regarding the incident at Ramlila Maidan on 4-5 June 2011, involving the imposition of p...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Leave India Notice by Australian Employee over Alleged Violation of Natural Justice and FRRO's Jurisdiction. Employment Visa Grant by High Commission Not Subject to FRRO's Nullification, Argues Petitioner.

9 Feb 2026

The writ petition was filed by an Australian citizen, who held an Employment Visa (E-2) valid from 08.01.2018 to 07.01.2020, after being appointed as ...

High Court

High Court of Madras Upholds Compensation Award in Motor Accident Case — Negligence of Bus Driver Established by Sudden Braking Without Warning. Claimant Lecturer Awarded Rs. 25,00,000 for Permanent Disability Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

8 Jan 2026

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on March 31, 2012, at about 09:30 p.m. The claimant, Suresh, was riding his Hero Honda motorcycle ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302 and 324 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

4 Dec 2023

The appellants, Satish Bansi Lagad, Bansi Kisan Lagad, Kisan Ganpat Lagad, and Aashabai Bansi Lagad, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Motor Accident Claim, Holding That Negligence of Bus Driver Established on Preponderance of Probability. The Court Rules That Standard of Proof in Accident Claims Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is Preponderance of Probabilities, Not Beyond Reasonable Doubt, and Sudden Movement of Bus While Passenger Alights Constitutes Negligence.

3 Aug 2023

This appeal arose from the dismissal of a claim petition by the Principal Senior Civil Judge and I Additional MACT, Karwar, in MVC No. 290/2017. The a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistent Witness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for causing death by strangulation set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

27 Jan 2022

The appellant, Nandakumar @ Chhotu Vasudev Samant, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai for the murder of his wife Suchitra under Se...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Disposes of Miscellaneous Application in Suo Motu Limitation Extension Case with Final Directions. The Court excluded the period from 15.03.2020 to 02.10.2021 in computing limitation under general and special laws, providing a 90-day period from 03.10.2021 for cases where limitation expired, and applied this to specific statutes including Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

23 Sep 2021

The Supreme Court of India, in suo motu proceedings initiated due to the COVID-19 pandemic, addressed the extension of limitation periods for legal pr...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses PIL Challenging State's Interpretation of Supreme Court Order Allowing Post-Deadline Transportation. The Petitioner Contends That the Supreme Court's Order Under Article 142 Permitted Only Excavation Till 15 March 2018 and Not Post-Deadline Transportation.

4 May 2018

The Goa Foundation, a public interest organization, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the State Government's decisi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Commodity Brokerage Dispute — Upholds Tribunal's Finding That Broker Failed to Prove Client's Liability. Member Client Agreement and Running Account Basis Did Not Shift Burden of Proof to Client Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Bonanza Commodities Brokers Pvt. Ltd., a member of Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd. (MCX), filed a petition under Section 34 of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals in 1996 Rajasthan Bus Bomb Blast Case; Reiterates Importance of Fair Trial and Due Process. The Court Examines Whether Conviction of Accused No. 9 Dr. Abdul Hameed and Accused No. 12 Pappu @ Salim Complied with Constitutional Guarantees of Fair Trial and Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

1 Jan 1970

The case arises from a devastating bomb blast that occurred on 22 May 1996 inside a Rajasthan Roadways bus near Samleti village while it was travellin...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)