Search Results for "subsistence allowance recovery"

28 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 28 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Union of India's Writ Petition Challenging CAT Order to Pay Full Salary During Suspension Period — Suspension Allowance Already Paid, No Entitlement to Full Salary Without Work.

The petitioners, Union of India and the General Manager, Ordnance Factory, Varangaon, challenged the judgment and order dated 09.03.2005 passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Recovery of Subsistence Allowance by Electricity Department. Resignation Does Not Bar Recovery of Amount Paid During Suspension Period.

The appellant, V. K. Muraleedharan Nair, was an employee of the Electricity Department, Government of Goa. He was suspended on 31.08.1989 due to inten...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Cross Appeals in Service Dispute Over Suspension and Terminal Benefits of Deceased Employee. The court held that salary during suspension is not payable if departmental enquiry is not completed, but provident fund and gratuity are statutory entitlements.

The case involves cross appeals arising from a judgment and decree dated 30.09.1992 in Special Civil Suit No. 102 of 1992. The plaintiffs, heirs of Di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Gratuity Payment Despite Departmental Enquiry — Forfeiture of Gratuity Requires Specific Finding of Quantified Loss. Employer Cannot Forfeit Gratuity Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Without Specific Charge and Finding of Quantified Loss.

The petitioner, Vinod Vinayak Jinturkar, a former employee of the Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation (respondent no.2), filed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Challenge to Reinstatement with 50% Backwages and Workman's Challenge to Enquiry Validity in Industrial Dispute. Labour Court's Finding of Non-Perverse Enquiry Upheld, Reinstatement with Partial Backwages Affirmed Under Industrial Disputes Act.

The judgment involves two writ petitions arising from an industrial dispute between Siemens Limited (the company) and its workman, Babulal Ramlal Walm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee in Income Tax Reference Under Section 256(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Profits on Sale of Machinery Not Taxable Under Section 41(2) as Depreciation Was Claimed by Dissolved Firm, Not by Assessee.

The case involves a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, for the opinion of the Bo...