Search Results for "squaring off"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "squaring off"

32 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 32 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Remand Order in Arbitration Matters — Single Judge Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 34 by Setting Aside Award and Remanding for Reconsideration Without Finding Award to Be Void or Inoperative. The Court Held That Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Does Not Confer Power of Remand; Only Remedies Are to Uphold, Modify, or Set Aside the Award.

25 Jun 2013

The appellant, Geojit Financial Services Limited (now Geojit BNP Paribas Financial Services Limited), a stock broker registered with the National Stoc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Broker-Client Dispute Over Margin Shortfall and Unauthorized Sale of Shares. Court upholds concurrent findings of arbitral tribunals that broker was entitled to sell shares to cover margin deficit under Member Client Agreement and bye-laws of National Stock Exchange.

6 Aug 2015

The petitioner, Ankit Bimal Deorah, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Share Broker Dispute for Ignoring Material Evidence and NSE Bye-laws. The court held that the arbitrator's failure to consider the petitioner's evidence and the bye-laws rendered the award perverse and liable to be set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

14 Mar 2013

The petitioner, M/s. Angel Capital & Debt Market Limited, a share broker, challenged an arbitral award dated 13 November 2009 passed by a sole arbitra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Patently Illegal or Contrary to Public Policy. The court upheld the arbitrator's findings that the respondent was entitled to recover the amount due from the petitioner for squared-off positions, rejecting the petitioner's counterclaim.

17 Sep 2012

The petitioner, Kritika Nagpal, appointed the respondent, Geojit Financial Services Ltd., to effect transactions on the Futures & Options Segment of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broking Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Contrary to Public Policy or Suffering from Patent Illegality.

10 Jun 2013

The petitioner, Bombay Construction and Engineering Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Non-Consideration of Counter Claim in NSEIL Dispute. Failure to consider counter claim amounts to legal misconduct and violation of natural justice under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

18 Sep 2012

The petitioner, Rajendra A. Shah (H.U.F.), a constituent, challenged an arbitral award dated 17th February 2009 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal consti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Client Against Trading Member for Unauthorized Trades. Award of Rs.6,59,634.54 with interest upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

19 Nov 2012

The petitioner, Angel Broking Private Limited, a trading member, challenged an arbitral award dated 29 August 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator appoint...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds SEBI Order Against Corporate Giant in Futures Manipulation Case. The Court held that cornering 93.63% open interest through agents and dumping shares to depress settlement price constituted fraud under PFUTP Regulations.

29 May 2026

The case involves appeals by Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) against orders of the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) which upheld SEBI's findings ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitration Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Upholds Award for Losses Due to Unauthorized Squaring Off of Positions. The court held that the arbitral award was based on evidence and reasoning, and no ground for interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was made out.

5 Mar 2012

The case involves a challenge by HSBC InvestDirect Securities (India) Ltd. (formerly IL & FS Investsmart Securities Ltd.), a stock broker registered w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Group Adjustment Letter Authorized Set-off of Losses Across Family Accounts. The court upheld the arbitral award rejecting the client's claim for unauthorized trades and wrongful disposal of shares, holding that the group adjustment letter was binding and the client failed to prove unauthorized trades.

27 Feb 2012

The petitioner, Manjula Arvind Thakkar, challenged an arbitral award dated 10 February 2010 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal constituted under the Byel...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)