Search Results for "sodomy"

15 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Sections 363, 377, 323 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority and guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Pankaj Dadarao Ambadkar, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-1 & Special Judge, Achalpur in Special (POCSO) Case No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in Rape and Sodomy Case under IPC Sections 376(2)(f), 377, 506. Conviction Based on Sole Testimony of Child Victim Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Mother's Testimony Under Section 157 Evidence Act; Minor Discrepancies in FIR Held Immaterial.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, Ramesh Bansiram Pawar, by the Adhoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Nashik, in Sessions Case No. 154 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Criminal Appeals Against Conviction for Kidnapping, Gang Rape, and Murder of a 3½-Year-Old Girl. Trial Court Convicted Under Sections 363, 366, 377, 302, 201 Read with 34 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence.

The Bombay High Court heard criminal appeals filed by four accused/appellants against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Unnatural Offence Under Section 377 IPC. Minor Inconsistencies in Evidence Do Not Warrant Interference in Revision as Testimony of Prosecutrix and Medical Evidence Support Conviction.

The applicant, Gulab s/o Shripat Sable, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Washim, for an offence under Section 377 of the Indian P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Conviction in Murder Case Due to Denial of Legal Aid. Failure to Provide Free Legal Services to Indigent Accused Violates Article 21 and Section 304 CrPC, Rendering Trial Void.

The appellant, Digambar Iranna Majkure, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment by the Adhoc Addit...