Search Results for "securitisation application"

362 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 362 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Auction Purchaser's Writ Petition for Physical Possession Under SARFAESI Act. Petition Filed by Auction Purchasers Seeking to Enforce Registered Sale Certificate and Section 14 Order Despite Borrower's Pending Appeal Against DRT Order.

The writ petition was filed by auction purchasers who had purchased a secured asset in an e-auction conducted by respondent No.2 bank under the SARFAE...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of DRAT Orders on Pre-Deposit Waiver and Status Quo in Secured Asset Auction. Legal Question Concerns Applicability of Section 18 Pre-Deposit Requirement to Appeals Dismissing Condonation of Delay and Challenging Sale Certificate.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by an auction purchaser (Aloukik Construwell LLP) and a secured creditor (HDFC Bank Limited) challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Plaint Rejection Upheld for Lack of Civil Court Jurisdiction. Dispute over mortgaged properties held to be exclusively triable by DRT under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The case involves two appeals arising from a suit filed by Pooja Ravikumar Nidasoshi and Vandana (plaintiffs) against the Gadhinglaj Urban Co-operativ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Official Liquidator to Take Possession of Factory Premises Despite Pending BIFR Reference Under SICA, 1985. Section 22 of SICA, 1985 does not bar winding up proceedings under Companies Act, 1956.

The Official Liquidator filed a report seeking directions to direct the ex-director of M/s Lifeline Industries Ltd. (in liquidation) to deposit advert...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up of S. Kumars Nationwide Ltd. for Inability to Pay Debts. Multiple financial creditors and operational creditors successfully proved the company's insolvency under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The judgment concerns a batch of company petitions filed by various financial creditors and operational creditors seeking the winding up of S. Kumars ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Assignee Bank Can Invoke SARFAESI Act for Debt Assigned by NBFC. The case involves interpretation of 'debt' and 'secured creditor' under SARFAESI Act, 2002 and RDDBFI Act, 1993, and the effect of assignment from a non-banking financial company to a bank.

The petitioner, a banking company, sought to enforce security interest under the SARFAESI Act after acquiring a debt and underlying security from a no...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Pre-deposit Condition Under SARFAESI Act — Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 18 Provisos. The court held that the legislature may condition the right of appeal and the provisions are not discriminatory compared to the RDB Act.

The petitioners, National Polymers and others, challenged an order dated 6 April 2011 of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal directing them to depos...