Search Results for "section 64(a)"

15 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute — Liquidated Damages and Interest Reduced. Court upholds arbitrator's finding on delay but modifies interest rate from 7% to 6% per annum under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Indian Oil Corporation Limited (petitioner) against a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers to Three-Judge Bench the Question Whether Quantity of Mixture or Pure Drug Content Determines Punishment Under NDPS Act. The Court Held That E. Micheal Raj Requires Reconsideration as It Omitted Note 2 of Notification and the Scheme of the Act Treating Preparations as a Whole.

The Supreme Court, in a reference arising from multiple appeals and writ petitions, considered the correctness of the decision in E. Micheal Raj v. In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Landlord-Tenant Dispute — Tenant Ordered to Vacate After Expiry of 30-Year Lease. The court upheld the decree for possession based on valid wills and the terms of the registered Kabulayat, rejecting the tenant's challenge to the landlord's title.

The case involves a second appeal before the Bombay High Court arising from a suit for possession of a house and appurtenant land. The suit property w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Considers Appeals Against Conviction Under Section 302 Read with 34 IPC. The Appeals Challenge Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence, Including Decomposed Body Identification and Extra-Judicial Confession.

The appeals arose from a conviction by the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Sessions Case No. 246 of 1997, where the accused were found ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Rejection of Nomination Papers for Rajya Sabha Elections. Filing of Nomination by Proposer Who is Not an Elector in the State Renders Nomination Invalid Under Section 33(1) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

The petitioners, who were candidates for election to the Rajya Sabha from Karnataka, challenged the rejection of their nomination papers by the Return...