Search Results for "section 6 specific relief act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "section 6 specific relief act"

18 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 18 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Possession Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Ownership and Possession in Favor of Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. The Court Held That the Defendant Failed to Prove Adverse Possession and That the Suit for Possession Without Declaration Was Maintainable Under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

19 Feb 2026

The appellant, Bhavesh Jivraj Solanki, was the defendant in a suit filed by Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. (PGVCL) for recovery of possession of lan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Possession Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act — Suit Filed Beyond Limitation of Six Months. Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Application Allowed as Plaint on Face Value Showed Suit Was Time-Barred.

29 Apr 2022

The petitioners, Shri Anandraj S/o Khemraj Dhariwal and Smt. Santoshidevi wd/o Khemraj Dhariwal, filed a suit for restoration of possession under Sect...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Construction in Property Dispute Among Family Members. Alleged Breach of Development Agreement and Illegal Construction on Common Property Leads to Status Quo Order.

26 Apr 2022

The dispute arises out of a family arrangement among the Motwane family members regarding a larger property at Khar, Mumbai. On 31st March, 1990, the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Decree Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act — Auction Purchaser Cannot Dispossess Without Due Process. Prior Possession and Forcible Dispossession Within Six Months Entitle Plaintiff to Restoration Irrespective of Title.

5 Apr 2018

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by Mr. Kadir Ilahi Bagwan (applicant) challenging the judgment and order dated 25th July 2016 pas...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Second Appeal and Remands Suit for Recovery of Possession for Fresh Adjudication; First Appellate Court's Decree Set Aside for Failure to Frame Points for Determination and Properly Prove Wills under Evidence Act.

20 Jul 2017

The case arose from a regular second appeal filed by the legal representatives of the original defendant against the judgment of the first appellate c...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Revision Against Dismissal of Suit for Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 — Petitioner Failed to Prove Dispossession Within Six Months. The court upheld the trial court's finding that the petitioner did not prove his possession and dispossession within the limitation period, and the revisional court cannot re-appreciate evidence unless perverse.

5 Jul 2017

The petitioner, Sudhakar Suryabhan Mankar, filed a Civil Revision Application before the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur against the dismissal of his s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Suit Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 — Delay Not a Bar When Amendment is Necessary for Effective Adjudication. The court held that an amendment to incorporate a prayer for possession and removal of encroachment in a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 should be allowed liberally at the pre-trial stage.

14 Jul 2011

The petitioners, Gaimukh Deosthan (a private trust) through its occupants/managers, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constituti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Suit for Possession Based on Title — Plaintiff's Possessory Title and Adverse Possession Upheld Against Defendants' Claim of Tenancy. The court held that the plaintiff had established possessory title and adverse possession over the suit land, and the defendants failed to prove their tenancy, thus reversing the lower appellate court's decree.

30 Mar 2010

The case involves a second appeal filed by the appellants (original plaintiffs) against a judgment and decree of the 7th Additional District Judge, Pu...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)