Search Results for "section 36(4)"

544 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 544 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as the complainant's testimony suffered from material contradictions and lack of corroboration.

The appellant, Nilesh Ramdhan Gavai, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune for the murder of Laxman under Section 302 IPC and sentenced...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Students in MBBS Admission Case Under Central Pool Seats Due to Denial of Fundamental Rights. Court Directs Immediate Admission and Systemic Reforms to Ensure Accessibility of Education for Marginalized Students from Ladakh Under Article 32 of the Constitution.

The Supreme Court of India addressed writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution by two students from Ladakh, Farzana Batool and Mohamma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence for Triple Murder of Children in Revenge Killing. Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory, Motive, and Recovery of Bodies at Accused's Instance.

The appellant, Manoj Suryavanshi, was convicted for the abduction and murder of three minor children (Vijay, Ajay, and Sakshi) aged 8, 6, and 4 years,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Confirms Death Penalty for Human Sacrifice of Two-Year-Old Boy in Tantric Ritual. Extra-judicial Confession and Recovery of Body from Accused's House Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Sections 302/34, 364/34, 201 IPC and Section 120B IPC.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a common judgment of the Chhattisgarh High Court confirming the conviction and death sentence of Ishw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Ransom. Conviction under Section 364-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the accused made a demand for ransom; conviction under Section 365 IPC upheld for abduction.

The appellant, Mehtab Alam Lalai Choudhari, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Section 364-A (kidnappi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Identification. Conviction under Sections 364-A, 363, 365 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand of ransom and identity of accused beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the kidnapping of a nine-year-old boy, Deepak, son of Mohanlal Oswal (PW1), on 30th June 1994 at about 7:30 p.m. from near his ho...