Search Results for "section 167(2) CrPC"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "section 167(2) CrPC"

54 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 54 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Default Bail in CBI Case Due to Expiry of 90-Day Remand Period. Computation of Statutory Period Under Section 167(2) CrPC Starts from First Remand by Magistrate Without Jurisdiction.

3 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Rajesh Natwarlal Bangawala, was arrested in connection with Crime No. RC/BSM/2014/E0002 under sections 201, 409, 420, 468, 471 read wi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Accused in NIA Case Seeking Default Bail Under UAPA — Filing of Incomplete Charge Sheet Within 90 Days Defeats Right to Default Bail. The court held that the right to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC does not accrue if a charge sheet is filed within the statutory period, even if incomplete, and the court can take cognizance on such charge sheet.

4 Dec 2025

The appellant, Hany Babu, was the original Accused No.12 in FIR No.1 of 2020 registered by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) under various secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Default Bail in Section 306 IPC Case — Offence Punishable Up to 10 Years Falls Under 60-Day Category Under Section 167(2) CrPC. The phrase 'imprisonment for a term of not less than ten years' means a minimum of ten years, not a maximum, so the 90-day period does not apply.

9 Jan 2014

The petitioner, Shakil Khan Yasin Khan, was arrested on 25 September 2013 in connection with Crime No. 153/2013 registered at Deopur Police Station, D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Resolves Conflict on Applicability of Section 167(2)(a)(i) vs (ii) CrPC for Default Bail in Offences Punishable with Life Imprisonment. The court held that life imprisonment is a term of not less than ten years, thus the 90-day period under clause (ii) applies.

7 Jul 2006

The case arose from a reference made by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court while hearing a bail application filed by two accused persons,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Murder Case Due to Incomplete Charge Sheet and Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC Allowed as Charge Sheet Not Filed Within Prescribed Period.

24 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Akash Mann T., was arrested in connection with Crime No.368/2018 registered at Mahalakshmipuram Police Station, Bengaluru, for offence...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Release of Under-Trial Prisoner on Bail in Murder Case — Right to Speedy Trial and Personal Liberty Under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Petitioner Acquitted in One Case and Granted Bail in Another, but Continued Detention in Third Case for Over Two Years Without Trial Violates Fundamental Rights.

2 Aug 2011

The petitioner, Damji Tingsa Pada, was apprehended by Gadchiroli Police on 5th August 2009 and shown arrested in three cases. During his detention, he...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Revision Against Rejection of Police Remand in IMFL Case — Custodial Interrogation Not Required as Accused in Judicial Custody and No Specific Recovery Pending. Magistrate's Order Rejecting Remand Under Section 167(2) CrPC Upheld as Reasoned and Not Perverse.

2 Mar 2026

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the State of Gujarat against an order of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, ...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Police Remand in IMFL Transportation Case — Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Accused Already in Custody and No Recovery Pending. The Court upheld the Magistrate's reasoned order rejecting police remand under Section 167(2) CrPC, finding no necessity for custodial interrogation.

2 Mar 2026

The present criminal revision application was filed by the original accused (petitioners) challenging the order dated 22.01.2026 passed by the learned...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Default Bail to Accused in MCOCA Case Due to Failure to File Charge Sheet Within 90 Days. Section 167(2) CrPC Entitles Accused to Indefeasible Right to Bail if Investigation Not Completed Within Statutory Period.

27 Nov 2018

The appellants, nine individuals, were arrested in connection with Crime No. 179 of 2018 registered at Anandnagar Police Station, Osmanabad, for vario...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC for Failure to Pass Specific Remand Extension Order. Mandatory Production of Accused and Specific Order Required for Valid Extension of Police Custody Remand.

21 Feb 2018

The petitioner, Parshuram s/o Bajirao Dongre, was arrested on 23.7.2017 in connection with Crime No. 85/2017 registered at Aheri Police Station, Gadch...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)