Search Results for "section 139 NI Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "section 139 NI Act"

32 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 32 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Not Attracted as Complainant Failed to Establish Legally Enforceable Debt or Liability.

16 Aug 2023

The case arises from a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, S.S. Ramesh, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable In...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Dishonour of Cheque Due to Insufficient Funds. Conviction Set Aside as Complainant Failed to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt or Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

10 Dec 2021

The revision petition was filed by Smt. Gouri, the accused, challenging her conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 dismissed as complainant failed to establish that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt or liability.

28 Sep 2021

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, S Ramesh Kumar, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable In...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Complainant Fails to Prove Legal Liability as Cheque Was Given as Security and Payment Already Made. The court upheld the trial court's finding that the accused had rebutted the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 by showing that the cheque was a security and that the debt had been discharged.

15 Nov 2019

The appellant, Shantaram Namdeo Sathe, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment and...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses Acquittal and Restores Conviction for Cheque Dishonour. The court held that the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 operates in favour of the complainant once the signature on the cheque is admitted, and the accused failed to rebut the presumption of legally enforceable debt.

19 Jul 2013

The appellant, Krishna P. Morajkar, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Mapusa, which set aside the convict...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Complainant's Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused. The court held that the accused failed to rebut the presumption that the cheques were issued for a legally enforceable debt, and the trial court's acquittal was erroneous.

19 Oct 2006

The case involves a criminal appeal filed by the complainant, Shanaz D'Souza, against the acquittal of the accused, Sheikh Ameer Saheeb, under Section...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act Not Rebutted. The court held that the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption that the cheque was issued for discharge of a debt or liability, leading to conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

19 Sep 2006

The appellant-complainant filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, alleging that the accused-respondent issued a c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Stop Payment Instruction Constitutes Offence Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court held that the drawer who stops payment of a cheque cannot escape liability if the cheque is dishonoured, and the presumption of a legally enforceable debt under Section 139 NI Act was not rebutted.

31 Aug 2006

The appellant, M/s P. V. Constructions, through its proprietor S. Venugopalan, filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of the respondent, K. J. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act for Dishonour of Cheques Issued in Discharge of Liability — Service of Notice by Registered Post Deemed Sufficient Despite Return as Undelivered.

22 Nov 2005

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 188...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case. Complainant's Admission of No Business Transaction Rebuts Presumption Under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

20 Jul 2005

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the original complainant and the State against the acquittal of the accused under Section 1...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)