Search Results for "section 126 CrPC"

159 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 159 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaints for Dishonour of Cheques Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Service of notice by speed post or courier must be proved by cogent evidence; mere dispatch is insufficient.

The Bombay High Court disposed of a batch of petitions and applications under Section 482 CrPC and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for FIR Registration Due to Police Inaction. Failure to Register FIR Violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution and the Mandatory Duty under Section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The petitioner, an agriculturist, claimed ownership and possession of agricultural land in Naribole village, Kalaburagi district. A dispute arose when...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Petition in Maintenance Execution Case — Offer to Maintain After Final Order Not Permissible. Second Proviso to Section 125(3) CrPC Cannot Be Invoked After Final Maintenance Order Under Section 125(1) CrPC.

The petitioner, Shivaji Tukaram Davargave, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the orders of the Magistrate and th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Petition Seeking to Offer Maintenance After Final Order Under Section 125(1) CrPC. Second Proviso to Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Apply in Execution Proceedings After Maintenance Order Has Become Final.

The petitioner, Shivaji Tukaram Davargave, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the orders of the Magistrate and th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashed Istegashas Issued Under Section 110(e) CrPC for Lack of Breach of Peace and Granted Token Compensation for Wrongful Detention. The Court Found That the Notices Did Not Disclose Any Element of Habitual Offences Involving Breach of Peace, Rendering the Detention Unlawful.

The petitioners, three individuals (Yusuf Khan, Irfan Khan, and Sharif Khan), were already incarcerated and due for release when separate Istegashas l...