Search Results for "sealed bottles"

64 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 64 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeals, Affirms Refund of Licence Fee and Differential Amount for Period of Unlawful Closure of Distillery Premises. Licensee Entitled to Refund When Premises Sealed Without Opportunity of Hearing, and Suspension Order Passed Without Show-Cause Notice.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by the State of Bihar against a Patna High Court judgment directing refund of licence fee and differential amount ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Prabhakar Pandurang Tambe, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for the murder of Rajendra Ingawale under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convict in Rape of Minor Case — Victim's Testimony Found Credible. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act upheld as medical evidence and prompt FIR corroborate victim's account.

The appellant, Ganesh Laxman Madne, was convicted by the Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, in Special Case No.44/2015 for offence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault of a Six-Year-Old Girl Under POCSO Act. Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Prompt FIR.

The appellant, Pravin S/o Suryabhanji Gube, was convicted by the learned Extra Joint Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur on 12.9.2018 in Special Child P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Rules. Failure to Follow Rule 14 and Rule 22 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Santosh Dattatreya Mamidwar, the accused, challenging his conviction under the Prevention o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Section 20 read with Section 29 of NDPS Act set aside as search and seizure conducted without proper procedure and evidence of conscious possession was insufficient.

The appellants, Baldeosingh s/o Jagannathsingh Sengar and Ishwarsingh s/o Dakursingh Gaur, were convicted by the Special Court under NDPS Act, Nagpur ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence for Six Accused in Brutal Dacoity, Murder, and Gang Rape Case. The court restored the death penalty for all six accused, reversing the High Court's reduction of sentence for three of them, based on the 'rarest of rare' doctrine.

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of appeals arising from a brutal home invasion and massacre that occurred on the night of June 5-6, 2003, in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Rule 14 and Section 13(2) of PFA Act. Benefit of Doubt Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Proper Stirring of Oil Sample and Timely Intimation of Right to Get Sample Analyzed.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal under Section 378(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the judgment dated 27-11-2002 in Regular Cr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Procedural Lapses. Delay in Sending Sample and Non-Examination of Public Analyst Fatal to Prosecution Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 25.4.2001 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pune, in R.C.C. No.100 of 19...