Search Results for "robbery with hurt"

2 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Convict in Robbery Case, Upholds Conviction Under Section 394 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act — Belated Defenses of Juvenility and Insanity Rejected as Unsubstantiated.

The Supreme Court dismissed the criminal appeal of Mohd. Anwar, who was convicted under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Section 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Modifies Conviction from Dacoity to Robbery with Hurt in Appeal Against Sessions Court Judgment. Appellant Convicted Under Section 394 IPC Instead of Sections 395 and 397 IPC as Prosecution Failed to Prove Presence of Five Persons for Dacoity.

The appellant, Balu Pandharinath Takle, was one of four accused charged with dacoity under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for al...