Search Results for "review dismissed"

5370 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5370 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Review Application in Property Suit — No Error Apparent on Record. Review under Section 114 CPC read with Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is not an appeal; mere disagreement with findings does not warrant review.

The present application was filed by the heirs of deceased Mahendrabhai Lallubhai Patel and others (original petitioners/defendants) under Section 114...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Review Applications in Service Benefits Case — No Error Apparent in Original Order Confirmed by Supreme Court. Review Applicants Sought Service Benefits Including Promotions and Revision of Pay but Failed to Show Any Error Apparent on Face of Record Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.

The applicants, employees of the Adi Dravidar Welfare Department, filed review applications under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Petitioner's challenge to SRA's refusal to grant occupancy certificate fails as review court finds no mistake or error in original judgment.

The petitioner, Mumtaz H. Khoja, filed a review petition against the judgment dated 16 October 2025 passed by the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Debt Recovery Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Petition under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC fails as petitioner failed to deposit amount as directed, and no grounds for review were made out.

The petitioner, M/s MRB Roadconst. Pvt. Ltd., filed a Review Petition before the Bombay High Court seeking review of an order dated 10th June 2015 pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Partition Suit — No Error Apparent on Record in Second Appeal Dismissal. Order 41 Rule 31 CPC Compliance Not Required at Admission Stage of Second Appeal.

The judgment concerns two review petitions filed by the original plaintiff, Genba Sahadu Modak (since deceased through his legal heir), against the di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Enforcement Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Petition Against Dismissal of Civil Appeals Under Section 48 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Rejected as Court Found No Ground for Review Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.

The Supreme Court of India dismissed review petitions filed by Arun Dev Upadhyaya against the judgment dated 10.08.2021 in Civil Appeal Nos. 8345-8346...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Club Licence Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Review sought against order requiring club to obtain licence under Section 176 of Karnataka Police Act, 1963; court held that review is not an appeal and no ground for review exists.

The petitioner, D.V.R.Recreation Club (a unit of Janege Green Gardens Private Limited), filed a review petition under Section 114 read with Order 47 R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Civil Procedure Code Case — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review Petition under Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 114 CPC fails as petitioner seeks re-argument on merits, not review of error.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, presided over by Hon'ble Mr. Justice S Sunil Dutt Yadav, delivered a CAV order on 16.12.2025 in Review Petit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Eviction Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review of judgment dated 21.10.2010 in Writ Petition No.711/2010 rejected as applicants sought re-argument of merits, not review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.

The applicants, tenants Shrichand s/o Rochaldas Khemani and Kawarlal s/o Rochaldas Khemani, filed a review application before the Bombay High Court, N...