Search Results for "revenue mutation"

885 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 885 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Ownership in Favor of Daughter. Claim of adverse possession by brother against sister fails as co-owner must prove ouster or denial of title.

The dispute pertains to agricultural lands and a house situated at Village Dhokawade, Taluka Alibaug, District Raigad, originally owned by Narayan Hir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Title Dispute — Mutation Entries Not Conclusive Proof of Title. Revenue authorities' decisions in mutation proceedings do not determine title; civil court must decide based on evidence.

The appellants (original plaintiffs) filed a second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 7th November 1990 passed by the learned Additional Di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Revenue Appeal Order and Demolition Notice — Mutation Entry Restored. The court held that the Land Revenue Code does not empower revenue authorities to order demolition and that mutation entries are presumptive evidence of possession, not title.

The petitioners, claiming to be owners and in possession of property surveyed under no.128/10 of Cavellosim Village, filed an application before the J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Mutation Entry Based on Will in Land Revenue Case — Civil Court Decree Binding on Revenue Authorities. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title and Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 227 Cannot Be Used to Reappreciate Evidence.

The petitioners, Amrutrao Shankarrao Deshmukh and Dhananjay Amrutrao Deshmukh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India ch...