Search Results for "retrospective validation"

34 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 34 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Section 9A of Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act Requiring Caste Validity Certificate for Councillors. Provision Held Valid as It Is a Reasonable Classification to Prevent Fraud on Reservation and Does Not Violate Articles 14 and 243T.

The petitioners, elected councillors of Jalna Municipal Council from reserved categories, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 9A of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Validation of DRI Officers' Jurisdiction. Establishing the authority of DRI officers as proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962.

The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Idea Cellular Ltd., challenging the jurisdiction of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Candidature in Municipal Elections. Court holds that the petitioner failed to establish that the respondent was not a Hindu or that he was not a member of the Scheduled Caste community, and that the Caste Scrutiny Committee's decision was not challenged.

The judgment involves two writ petitions filed by Smt. Chaitrali Prakash Borhade and Prem Seva Mahila Mandal & Anr. challenging the candidature of Raj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Show Cause Notice and Retrospective Amendment to Section 28 of Customs Act, 1962 — Upholds Validity of Officers' Powers and Amendment.

The petitioner, Sunil Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging a show caus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Members for Non-Submission of Caste Validity Certificates — Holds That Disqualification Under Section 10(1A) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 Requires Prior Opportunity of Hearing and Cannot Be Automatic.

The petitioners, three women elected as Sarpanch and Members of Gram Panchayat Kshetra Mahuli, challenged an order dated 11th February 2025 passed by ...