Search Results for "retrospective recovery"

239 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 239 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Waqf Act Jurisdiction Dispute - Tribunal Lacks Jurisdiction For Non-Notified Properties, Civil Court Retains Authority For Property Status Determination.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Appellants against Respondents, setting aside the High Court order and allowing the application under Or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of 100% EOU in Customs Duty Case for Unauthorized DTA Sales of Cut Flowers. Cut Flowers Held Non-Excisable, Duty Leviable on Inputs Under Notification No. 126/94-Cus as Amended, Extended Limitation Period Invoked for Wilful Suppression.

The appeal arises from a dispute between M/s. L.R. Brothers Indo Flora Ltd., a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) engaged in floriculture, and the Commis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee in Income Tax Appeal Over TDS Disallowance. Disallowance of Rs. 57,11,625 upheld under Section 40(a)(ia) of Income Tax Act, 1961 as assessee failed to deduct tax at source on payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 per goods receipt to truck operators under Section 194C.

The dispute arose from an income tax assessment for the year 2005-2006 involving Shree Choudhary Transport Company, a partnership firm engaged in tran...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Interim Compensation Order Under Section 143A NI Act for Pre-Amendment Offences. Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, is Prospective and Cannot Apply to Complaints Filed Before Its Insertion on 1 September 2018.

The case arose from a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, filed in 2016 against the appellant G.J. Raja by the respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Antidumping Duty Gap Period Case. Tribunal's Decision That No Antidumping Duty Can Be Levied During Period Between Expiry of Provisional Duty and Imposition of Final Duty Under Rule 21 of Customs Tariff (Antidumping) Rules, 1995 Upheld.

The Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai, filed appeals against orders of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated 1 Aug...