Search Results for "requisition without compensation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "requisition without compensation"

237 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 237 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition by MSEDCL Without Due Process — Acquisition of Land for Electricity Sub-Station Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that the acquisition of land by MSEB without following the procedure under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, is illegal and directed restoration of possession or payment of compensation.

5 Jan 2024

The petitioners, owners of land admeasuring 6685 sq.mtrs at Village Panchpakhadi, Thane, challenged the acquisition of their land by the Maharashtra S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Compensation for Unauthorized Possession of Land by NHAI — Failure to Acquire Additional Area Despite Taking Possession Violates Article 300A of Constitution. The court held that the respondents cannot retain possession of the additional 8350 sq.mtrs without paying compensation and directed them to pay compensation for use and occupation and to initiate acquisition proceedings under the National Highways Act, 1956.

7 Feb 2025

The petitioners, Tushar Laxman Bhakare @ Chawhan and Baby Laxman Bhakare @ Chawhan, are owners of land admeasuring 3 Ha-39 Ares from Gat No.402 situat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Possession of Requisitioned Flat Due to Laches and Alternative Remedy. Petitioners' claim for derequisition and possession of flat requisitioned under Bombay Land Acquisition Act, 1948 rejected as they failed to challenge the order of allotment to Respondent No.5 and delayed filing.

7 Jan 2014

The petitioners, claiming to be owners of a flat in Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of certiorari t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Dispute Due to Failure to Follow Statutory Procedure and Prove Compensation Payment. State Cannot Retain Land Without Valid Acquisition Under Sikkim Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1977.

2 Mar 2020

The case involves a dispute over 7.07 acres of land in East Sikkim that was allegedly acquired by the Agriculture Department of the Government of Sikk...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Finding of Violation of Sections 25F and 25G, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, But Questions Reinstatement Relief. The Court Examines Whether Reinstatement with Back Wages Is Mandatory for a Daily-Wager Illegally Retrenched from a Temporary Afforestation Scheme.

28 Sep 2018

The writ petition arose from a challenge by the employer, the Social Forestry Department of the Government of Maharashtra, against the concurrent orde...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Labour Commissioner's Order Under Section 33C(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Recovery Certificate for Backwages Upheld Despite Bank's Claim of Limitation and Set-Off

4 Jul 2018

The petitioner, The Goa Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd., challenged an order dated 24/03/2017 passed by the Labour Commissioner under Section 33C(1) of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Compensation Enhancement for Acquired Land in Malad. Reference Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Seeks Higher Compensation Than Awarded by SLAO.

23 Jun 2026

These proceedings arose from the acquisition of land under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The acquired property comprised land bearing Survey No. 91 ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition by Corporation of the City of Panaji Challenging Compensation Award Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Holds That Petitioner Failed to Show Any Error in the Award and Scope of Judicial Review Is Limited.

5 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Corporation of the City of Panaji, challenged an award dated 08.07.2014 passed by the Land Acquisition Officer (LAO) under Section 48 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Petition Due to Non-Application of Correct Market Value. Petitioner's Land Acquired in 2008 for Satara Municipal Council, Court Directs Recalculation Based on Comparable Sale Instances Under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

7 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Zal Sam Cooper, owned land in Satara that was acquired by the State of Maharashtra for the Satara Municipal Council under the Land Acq...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 2973 OF 2025

1 Apr 2025

...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)