Search Results for "recovery after superannuation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "recovery after superannuation"

259 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 259 result(s)

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Employees Provident Fund Pension Fraud Case Due to Misrepresentation and Non-Disclosure. Petitioner's Failure to Disclose Earlier Pension in Form 10-D and Application for Early Pension While in Subsequent Employment Constituted Fraud Under Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 and Employees Pension Scheme, 1995.

5 Mar 2026

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard a writ petition concerning allegations of pension fraud under the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellane...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Management Appeal in Industrial Standing Orders Certification Dispute — Certification of Standing Orders Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Section 4 of Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946. The Certifying Officer failed to consider objections and provide hearing, and the Appellate Authority passed a cryptic order, warranting remand for fresh consideration.

24 Oct 2025

The case involves a dispute between the Management of M/s Grasim Industries Ltd. (appellant) and the Harihar Polyfibers Employees Union (respondent No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Professor's Petition, Quashes Recovery from Gratuity and Pension. Recovery of Rs.8,43,782/- from retiral benefits set aside as employer failed to prove misrepresentation or fraud by employee, and recovery from pension/gratuity is impermissible under settled law.

25 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Ganesh Sitaram Magar, a retired Ayurved professor, challenged the recovery of Rs.8,43,782/- from his gratuity and pension benefits. He...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Retired MIDC Employee Challenging Initiation of Enquiry After Superannuation and Withholding of Retiral Benefits. Disciplinary proceedings cannot be initiated after retirement without specific service rule provision; retiral benefits cannot be withheld without following procedure under Rule 9(1) of MIDC Employees' Pension Rules, 1987.

8 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Pratapsinh Kedar Patil, was an employee of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) who served for over 33 years and ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Retired Bank Employee's Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Pension — Orders Release of Pension with Interest at 6%. Pension is a right and not a bounty; disciplinary proceedings abate on retirement unless rules permit continuation; denial of pension without valid proceedings is arbitrary.

14 Jun 2023

The petitioner, Gururaj Ramacharya Havanur, was a retired employee of Syndicate Bank (respondent-Bank) who had served as Manager at Ballari from 2007 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Employee in Leave Encashment Dispute — Recovery of Mistaken Payment from Gratuity Held Unjust. Petitioner's Leave Encashment Payment Was Not Mistaken as Government Resolution Did Not Apply to Non-Teaching Staff of Social Work Colleges.

8 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Prakash Suryabhanji Ninghot, was appointed as a Peon on 01.10.1982 with respondent 5-College, a 100% grant-in-aid Social Work college....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Employees' Right to Gratuity in Pending Criminal Appeals Under Kerala Service Rules. Interpretation of Rules 3 and 3A of Kerala Service Rules Distinguishes Pension from Death-cum-Retirement Gratuity, Prohibiting Withholding Despite Conviction with Suspended Sentence.

15 Mar 2022

The Supreme Court examined appeals arising from a Full Bench judgment of the Kerala High Court concerning the entitlement of government employees to D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Chargesheet Against Retired Professor in University Departmental Enquiry — Delay and Lack of Sanction Render Proceedings Invalid. Post-retirement disciplinary proceedings initiated after superannuation without prior sanction under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, and with inordinate delay, are unsustainable.

18 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Dr. Dipak Vishwnathrao Muley, a retired Professor of Shivaji University, Kolhapur, challenged a chargesheet dated 28 August 2018 issue...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Examines Legality of Pension Recovery Conditions Imposed Post-Facto for APMC Employment. Petition Challenges Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal’s Finding that Reemployment Constituted Commercial Employment under Rule 163(8) of Pension Rules.

20 Jul 2017

The petitioner retired from the Maharashtra State Government service on 31.05.1992 and immediately joined as Secretary of the Agriculture Produce Mark...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Chargesheet Against Retired University Employee for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Discipline Rules. Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated After Voluntary Retirement Cannot Be Sustained Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979 Without Specific Provision.

3 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Manohar B. Patil, was an employee of the Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University. He applied for voluntary retirement and w...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)