Search Results for "reconstruction licence"

112 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 112 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Lock and Seal Notice in Unauthorised Construction Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 56(2A) of Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971. Notice Must Specify Time for Compliance Before Locking and Sealing; Failure to Do So Renders Notice Invalid.

The petitioner, R. Ashokan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 24.10.2025 issued by the B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Cross Writ Petitions Against Order Refusing to Reject Plaint in Commercial Suit — Dispute Over Nature of Agreements as Lease or Leave and Licence Requires Trial.

The judgment concerns two cross writ petitions arising from a commercial suit. The petitioner, Siyaram Packaging Pvt. Ltd., filed Commercial Suit No.4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Copyright Injunction Against Music Streaming Service in Interpretation of Section 31D of Copyright Act, 1957. The court held that a statutory license under Section 31D for radio broadcasting does not extend to internet streaming services like Wynk Music.

The case involves two appeals by Wynk Ltd and Bharti Airtel Ltd (defendants) against an order of the Bombay High Court (SJ Kathawalla J) dated 23rd Ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Municipal Demolition Case — High Court Cannot Direct Reconstruction of Demolished Structure. The court held that the power to demolish illegal structures is vested in the municipal corporation and courts cannot direct reconstruction even if procedure was violated.

The case involves appeals by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai against a High Court order directing reconstruction of a demolished structure...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds DRAT Order Requiring 25% Pre-deposit for Waiver of Appeal Under SARFAESI Act. Legal Heirs of Guarantor Must Deposit 25% of Section 13(2) Notice Amount as Condition for Hearing Appeal on Merits.

The petitioners, Smt. Julie Amitabh Parekh and others, who are the legal heirs of the deceased guarantor Amitabh Arun Parekh, filed a writ petition ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...