Search Results for "recognised trade union"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "recognised trade union"

537 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 537 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Rejection of Recognition Application Under MRTU and PULP Act. Industrial Court's finding that the Petitioner-Union failed to establish membership among employees of the successor company PMPML upheld.

22 Mar 2024

The Petitioner, Pune Mahanagar Parivahan Mahamandal Karmachari Mahasangh, a trade union, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Trade Union Recognition and Election in Air India. Court upholds the validity of the recognition granted to Air India Employees Union and the election conducted under the Code of Discipline in Industry, 1958.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Air India Employees Guild and Air Corporation Employees Union challenging the recognition granted...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Industrial Court's Interim Orders Suspending Recognized Union's Rights for Non-Compliance with Section 19(iv) of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. The court held that interim relief cannot be granted without first determining compliance with statutory requirements under Section 19(iv) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

18 Jan 2018

The petitioner, Swarajya Kamgar Sanghtana, a recognized trade union at Exide Industries Ltd., challenged two orders of the Industrial Court, Ahmednaga...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Labour Commissioner's Order Recognizing Protected Workmen in Industrial Dispute — Petitioner's Right to Object to Union's Nominees Upheld Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Conciliation Officer Must Consider Employer's Objections and Pass Reasoned Order Under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

17 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Tata Marcopolo Motors Limited, is a registered company with a factory in Belur Industrial Area, Dharwad. Some of its employees are mem...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Regional Labour Commissioner's Order Declaring Office Bearers of Unrecognized Union as Protected Workmen Under Section 33(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Only Office Bearers of Recognized Union (Federation) Are Entitled to Protected Workmen Status; Deemed Recognition on Expiry of 15 Days Not Contemplated Under Rule 61(4) of Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957.

12 Nov 2024

The Petitioner, Tata Communications Limited, challenged an order dated 14 August 2024 passed by the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), Pune, decl...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Trade Union to File as Operational Creditor Under IBC — Workers' Dues Constitute Operational Debt. Trade Union, Being a Body Corporate Under Trade Unions Act, Can Represent Workmen Collectively for Insolvency Proceedings.

30 Apr 2019

The appeal arose from a long-standing dispute concerning a jute mill that had been closed permanently on 07.03.2014. The appellant, JK Jute Mill Mazdo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging Labour Court's Finding on Majority Union. Membership Verification by Labour Court is Final and Binding on Employer and Rival Union.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a dispute between two trade unions, Akhil Dadra & Nagar Haveli Kamgar Sangh (appellant in LPA 197/2008) and Krantikari Kamgar Union ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Industrial Court's Order Allowing Amendment and Refusing Appointment of Investigating Officer in Trade Union Recognition Dispute. Amendment to include correct membership figures for statutory period allowed as it does not change nature of application and membership strength is a question of fact to be proved by evidence under Section 14 of Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

6 Sep 2013

The dispute arose from an application filed by the First Respondent union under Section 14 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Preventi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Rejection of Workman's Complaint Seeking Cancellation of Recognition of Union. Individual Employee Cannot Initiate Proceedings Under Section 13 of MRTU & PULP Act.

3 May 2018

The dispute arose out of a complaint filed by an individual workman, Bharat Jijaba Shinde, purportedly on behalf of 309 out of 400 employees of Force ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Maintainability of Successive Recognition Application Under Section 14 of MRTU & PULP Act. No One-Year Bar Exists After Disposal of Previous Application; Only Bar is Within One Year of Recognition of Another Union.

2 Feb 2005

The case involves a challenge by the Petitioner Union, Kamgar Utkarsha Sabha, which was a recognized trade union in the undertaking of Respondent No.2...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)